These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Origins, taxa, names and meanings. Rieppel O Cladistics; 2008 Aug; 24(4):598-610. PubMed ID: 34879627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The PhyloCode: a critical discussion of its theoretical foundation. Rieppel O Cladistics; 2006 Apr; 22(2):186-197. PubMed ID: 34892874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Constraints in naming parts of the Tree of Life. Hillis DM Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):331-8. PubMed ID: 16997582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Species and kinds: a critique of Rieppel's "one of a kind" account of species. Reydon TAC Cladistics; 2009 Dec; 25(6):660-667. PubMed ID: 34879593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two issues in archaeological phylogenetics: taxon construction and outgroup selection. O'Brien MJ; Lyman RL; Saab Y; Saab E; Darwent J; Glover DS J Theor Biol; 2002 Mar; 215(2):133-50. PubMed ID: 12051970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New proposals for naming lower-ranked taxa within the frame of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Dubois A C R Biol; 2006 Oct; 329(10):823-40. PubMed ID: 17027643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The PhyloCode and the distinction between taxonomy and nomenclature. Queiroz Kd Syst Biol; 2006 Feb; 55(1):160-2. PubMed ID: 16507533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Taxon names and varieties of reference. Witteveen J Hist Philos Life Sci; 2021 Jun; 43(2):78. PubMed ID: 34081231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Classification of apocynaceae s.l. according to a new approach combining Linnaean and phylogenetic taxonomy. Sennblad B; Bremer B Syst Biol; 2002 Jun; 51(3):389-409. PubMed ID: 12079641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Species Names in the PhyloCode: the approach adopted by the International Society for Phylogenetic Nomenclature. Dayrat B; Cantino PD; Clarke JA; de Queiroz K Syst Biol; 2008 Jun; 57(3):507-14. PubMed ID: 18570043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A review of criticisms of phylogenetic nomenclature: is taxonomic freedom the fundamental issue? Bryant HN; Cantino PD Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2002 Feb; 77(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 11911373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Naming taxa from cladograms: a cautionary tale. Dubois A Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):317-30. PubMed ID: 16949307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biological taxon names are descriptive names. Brzozowski JA Hist Philos Life Sci; 2020 Jun; 42(3):29. PubMed ID: 32591904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impacts of phylogenetic nomenclature on the efficacy of the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Leslie MS Conserv Biol; 2015 Feb; 29(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 25155291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stability and universality in the application of taxon names in phylogenetic nomenclature. Bertrand Y; Härlin M Syst Biol; 2006 Oct; 55(5):848-58. PubMed ID: 17060205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Proposal of Yaniellaceae fam. nov., Yaniella gen. nov. and Sinobaca gen. nov. as replacements for the illegitimate prokaryotic names Yaniaceae Li et al. 2005, Yania Li et al. 2004, emend Li et al. 2005, and Sinococcus Li et al. 2006, respectively. Li WJ; Zhi XY; Euzéby JP Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 58(Pt 2):525-7. PubMed ID: 18218962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]