624 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17464885)
1. Distinguishing terminal monophyletic groups from reticulate taxa: performance of phenetic, tree-based, and network procedures.
Reeves PA; Richards CM
Syst Biol; 2007 Apr; 56(2):302-20. PubMed ID: 17464885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics].
Pavlinov IIa
Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies.
Huson DH; Bryant D
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Feb; 23(2):254-67. PubMed ID: 16221896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does gene flow destroy phylogenetic signal? The performance of three methods for estimating species phylogenies in the presence of gene flow.
Eckert AJ; Carstens BC
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 Dec; 49(3):832-42. PubMed ID: 18845264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When being "most likely" is not enough: examining the performance of three uses of the parametric bootstrap in phylogenetics.
Antezana M
J Mol Evol; 2003 Feb; 56(2):198-222. PubMed ID: 12574867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inferring phylogenetic networks by the maximum parsimony criterion: a case study.
Jin G; Nakhleh L; Snir S; Tuller T
Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Jan; 24(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 17068107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detecting hybrid speciation in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting using gene tree incongruence: a model.
Meng C; Kubatko LS
Theor Popul Biol; 2009 Feb; 75(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 19038278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reticulate evolution and incomplete lineage sorting among the ponderosa pines.
Willyard A; Cronn R; Liston A
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Aug; 52(2):498-511. PubMed ID: 19249377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SuperTRI: A new approach based on branch support analyses of multiple independent data sets for assessing reliability of phylogenetic inferences.
Ropiquet A; Li B; Hassanin A
C R Biol; 2009 Sep; 332(9):832-47. PubMed ID: 19748458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Towards building the tree of life: a simulation study for all angiosperm genera.
Salamin N; Hodkinson TR; Savolainen Coates V
Syst Biol; 2005 Apr; 54(2):183-96. PubMed ID: 16012091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reticulate evolution in the natural range of the invasive wetland tree species Melaleuca quinquenervia.
Cook LG; Morris DC; Edwards RD; Crisp MD
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 May; 47(2):506-22. PubMed ID: 18387315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The cytochrome b gene as a phylogenetic marker: the limits of resolution for analyzing relationships among cichlid fishes.
Farias IP; Ortà G; Sampaio I; Schneider H; Meyer A
J Mol Evol; 2001 Aug; 53(2):89-103. PubMed ID: 11479680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of reticulate evolution on genome phylogeny.
Beiko RG; Doolittle WF; Charlebois RL
Syst Biol; 2008 Dec; 57(6):844-56. PubMed ID: 19085328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of the distribution of bootstrap tree lengths using the maximum parsimony method.
Bhattacharya D
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1996 Dec; 6(3):339-50. PubMed ID: 8975690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imputing supertrees and supernetworks from quartets.
Holland B; Conner G; Huber K; Moulton V
Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 17366137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Untangling long branches: identifying conflicting phylogenetic signals using spectral analysis, neighbor-net, and consensus networks.
Kennedy M; Holland BR; Gray RD; Spencer HG
Syst Biol; 2005 Aug; 54(4):620-33. PubMed ID: 16109705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phylogenetic accuracy.
Rokas A; Carroll SB
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 May; 22(5):1337-44. PubMed ID: 15746014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does choice in model selection affect maximum likelihood analysis?
Ripplinger J; Sullivan J
Syst Biol; 2008 Feb; 57(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 18275003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conditioned genome reconstruction: how to avoid choosing the conditioning genome.
Spencer M; Bryant D; Susko E
Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):25-43. PubMed ID: 17366135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trees of trees: an approach to comparing multiple alternative phylogenies.
Nye TM
Syst Biol; 2008 Oct; 57(5):785-94. PubMed ID: 18853364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
