These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
626 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17464885)
1. Distinguishing terminal monophyletic groups from reticulate taxa: performance of phenetic, tree-based, and network procedures. Reeves PA; Richards CM Syst Biol; 2007 Apr; 56(2):302-20. PubMed ID: 17464885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics]. Pavlinov IIa Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Huson DH; Bryant D Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Feb; 23(2):254-67. PubMed ID: 16221896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does gene flow destroy phylogenetic signal? The performance of three methods for estimating species phylogenies in the presence of gene flow. Eckert AJ; Carstens BC Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 Dec; 49(3):832-42. PubMed ID: 18845264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When being "most likely" is not enough: examining the performance of three uses of the parametric bootstrap in phylogenetics. Antezana M J Mol Evol; 2003 Feb; 56(2):198-222. PubMed ID: 12574867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inferring phylogenetic networks by the maximum parsimony criterion: a case study. Jin G; Nakhleh L; Snir S; Tuller T Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Jan; 24(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 17068107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detecting hybrid speciation in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting using gene tree incongruence: a model. Meng C; Kubatko LS Theor Popul Biol; 2009 Feb; 75(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 19038278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reticulate evolution and incomplete lineage sorting among the ponderosa pines. Willyard A; Cronn R; Liston A Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Aug; 52(2):498-511. PubMed ID: 19249377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SuperTRI: A new approach based on branch support analyses of multiple independent data sets for assessing reliability of phylogenetic inferences. Ropiquet A; Li B; Hassanin A C R Biol; 2009 Sep; 332(9):832-47. PubMed ID: 19748458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Towards building the tree of life: a simulation study for all angiosperm genera. Salamin N; Hodkinson TR; Savolainen Coates V Syst Biol; 2005 Apr; 54(2):183-96. PubMed ID: 16012091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reticulate evolution in the natural range of the invasive wetland tree species Melaleuca quinquenervia. Cook LG; Morris DC; Edwards RD; Crisp MD Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 May; 47(2):506-22. PubMed ID: 18387315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The cytochrome b gene as a phylogenetic marker: the limits of resolution for analyzing relationships among cichlid fishes. Farias IP; Ortà G; Sampaio I; Schneider H; Meyer A J Mol Evol; 2001 Aug; 53(2):89-103. PubMed ID: 11479680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of reticulate evolution on genome phylogeny. Beiko RG; Doolittle WF; Charlebois RL Syst Biol; 2008 Dec; 57(6):844-56. PubMed ID: 19085328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of the distribution of bootstrap tree lengths using the maximum parsimony method. Bhattacharya D Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1996 Dec; 6(3):339-50. PubMed ID: 8975690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imputing supertrees and supernetworks from quartets. Holland B; Conner G; Huber K; Moulton V Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 17366137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Untangling long branches: identifying conflicting phylogenetic signals using spectral analysis, neighbor-net, and consensus networks. Kennedy M; Holland BR; Gray RD; Spencer HG Syst Biol; 2005 Aug; 54(4):620-33. PubMed ID: 16109705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phylogenetic accuracy. Rokas A; Carroll SB Mol Biol Evol; 2005 May; 22(5):1337-44. PubMed ID: 15746014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does choice in model selection affect maximum likelihood analysis? Ripplinger J; Sullivan J Syst Biol; 2008 Feb; 57(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 18275003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conditioned genome reconstruction: how to avoid choosing the conditioning genome. Spencer M; Bryant D; Susko E Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):25-43. PubMed ID: 17366135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Trees of trees: an approach to comparing multiple alternative phylogenies. Nye TM Syst Biol; 2008 Oct; 57(5):785-94. PubMed ID: 18853364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]