647 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17464902)
1. [Rehabilitation and Diagnosis Related Groups (REDIA Study): impact of DRG introduction in the acute sector on medical rehabilitation in Germany].
von Eiff W; Meyer N; Klemann A; Greitemann B; Karoff M
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2007 Apr; 46(2):74-81. PubMed ID: 17464902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [REDIA--impacts of DRG introduction in the acute sector on medical rehabilitation].
von Eiff W; Schüring S; Greitemann B; Karoff M
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2011 Aug; 50(4):214-21. PubMed ID: 21800267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [New forms of remuneration and care delivery: their impact on rehabilitation].
Haaf HG; Volke E; Schliehe F
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2004 Oct; 43(5):312-24. PubMed ID: 15472790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Primary hip- and knee arthroplasty--comparison of the actual costs with the Australian diagnosis related groups (DRG)-].
Schürmann N; Müller RT
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2002; 140(6):589-94. PubMed ID: 12476379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Impact of the DRG system for subacute and rehabilitative treatment in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia].
Köhler F
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2002 Feb; 41(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 11830788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What's in team rehabilitation care after arthroplasty for osteoarthritis? Results from a multicenter, longitudinal study assessing structure, process, and outcome.
Grotle M; Garratt AM; Klokkerud M; Løchting I; Uhlig T; Hagen KB
Phys Ther; 2010 Jan; 90(1):121-31. PubMed ID: 20045807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluating the first German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) in cardiological patients: problems in the correct medical and economic grouping].
Reinecke H; Bunzemeier H; Fürstenberg T; Rothenburger M; Böcker D; Scheld HH; Breithardt G; Roeder N
Z Kardiol; 2003 Jul; 92(7):581-94. PubMed ID: 12883843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Developing an evidence based clinical guideline on cardiac rehabilitation--Phase 2: comparative analysis of the present level of service provision in cardiac rehabilitation based on the KTL statistics].
Bitzer EM; Klosterhuis H; Dörning H; Rose S
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2003 Apr; 42(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 12701001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison between early and late inpatient rehabilitation measures after implantation of total hip endoprostheses].
Scherak O; Kolarz G; Wottawa A; Maager M; el Shohoumi M
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 1998 Aug; 37(3):123-7. PubMed ID: 9789313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Risk scores and outcomes after cholecystectomy: a comparison between a university hospital and a short-stay clinic--a prospective observational study].
Schmidt C; Reibe F; Sellschopp C; Möller J; Bauer M; Kremer B
Zentralbl Chir; 2008 Sep; 133(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 18924051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Financing in knee arthroplasty: a benchmarking analysis.
Effenberger H; Rehart S; Zumstein MD; Schuh A
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Dec; 128(12):1349-56. PubMed ID: 18309508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Documentation of surgical performance--does more really help more? Comparison of the effects of maximum and limited documentation depth of clinical patient data on theoretical revenue volume of a surgical clinic after introduction of the DRG-based reimbursement system].
Mieth M; Wolkener F; Schmidt J; Glück E; Klar E; Kraus T
Chirurg; 2002 May; 73(5):492-9. PubMed ID: 12089835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Integrated health care: do integrated health care contracts deliver what they promise?].
Grüner S; Haas H
Z Orthop Unfall; 2007; 145(5):546-9. PubMed ID: 17955420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Developing rehabilitation treatment groups for cardiology and orthopaedics -- findings of a research project].
Ranneberg J; Neubauer G
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2005 Feb; 44(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 15668850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation treatment and cost-effectiveness relations--A comparison between inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation programmes].
Vom Orde A; Schott T; Iseringhausen O
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2002; 41(2-3):119-29. PubMed ID: 12007036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Total hip replacement in the G-DRG-system].
Kaufmann MM; Franz D; Lassahn C; Siebert CH
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2007; 145(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 17345545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Suggestions for implementation of DRG in the fields of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery for 2004].
Roeder N; Franz D; Siebert H; Frank D; Stücker R; Meiners T; Tempka A; Siebert CH
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 12928992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Introduction of diagnosis-related groups in Germany: evaluation of impact on in-patient care in a dermatological setting.
Hensen P; Beissert S; Bruckner-Tuderman L; Luger TA; Roeder N; Müller ML
Eur J Public Health; 2008 Feb; 18(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 17569699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A DRG based future hospital funding scheme: state of implementation and impact in the field of rehabilitation].
Rochell B; Roeder N
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2002 Feb; 41(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 11830787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Social medicine consequences for total endoprosthesis patients. Postoperative loadbearing of hip and knee prostheses].
Casser HR
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 12769079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
