These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17465313)

  • 1. Tests of behavioral-economic assessments of relative reinforcer efficacy: economic substitutes.
    Madden GJ; Smethells JR; Ewan EE; Hursh SR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Mar; 87(2):219-40. PubMed ID: 17465313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tests of behavioral-economic assessments of relative reinforcer efficacy II: economic complements.
    Madden GJ; Smethells JR; Ewan EE; Hursh SR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2007 Nov; 88(3):355-67. PubMed ID: 18047226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pigeons' demand and preference for specific and generalized conditioned reinforcers in a token economy.
    Tan L; Hackenberg TD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Nov; 104(3):296-314. PubMed ID: 26676183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Replacing relative reinforcing efficacy with behavioral economic demand curves.
    Johnson MW; Bickel WK
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jan; 85(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 16602377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of measures of relative reinforcing efficacy and behavioral economics: cigarettes and money in smokers.
    Bickel WK; Madden GJ
    Behav Pharmacol; 1999 Nov; 10(6-7):627-37. PubMed ID: 10780504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A steady-state test of the demand curve analysis of relative reinforcer efficacy.
    Madden GJ; Hartman EC
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2006 Feb; 14(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 16503707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unit price as a useful metric in analyzing effects of reinforcer magnitude.
    DeGrandpre RJ; Bickel WK; Hughes JR; Layng MP; Badger G
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1993 Nov; 60(3):641-66. PubMed ID: 8283154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison between traditional economical and demand curve analyses of relative reinforcer efficacy in the validation of preference assessment predictions.
    Reed DD; Luiselli JK; Magnuson JD; Fillers S; Vieira S; Rue HC
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2009 Jun; 12(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 19466625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extending stimulus preference assessment with the operant demand framework.
    Gilroy SP; Waits JA; Feck C
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Jun; 54(3):1032-1044. PubMed ID: 33706423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deconstructing relative reinforcing efficacy and situating the measures of pharmacological reinforcement with behavioral economics: a theoretical proposal.
    Bickel WK; Marsch LA; Carroll ME
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2000 Dec; 153(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 11255928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Demand equations for qualitatively different foods under fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of three data conversions.
    Foster TM; Sumpter CE; Temple W; Flevill A; Poling A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Nov; 92(3):305-26. PubMed ID: 20514164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behavioral economic analysis of the effects of N-substituted benztropine analogs on cocaine self-administration in rats.
    Zanettini C; Wilkinson DS; Katz JL
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2018 Jan; 235(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 28932889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Behavioral economics of concurrent ethanol-sucrose and sucrose reinforcement in the rat: effects of altering variable-ratio requirements.
    Petry NM; Heyman GM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Nov; 64(3):331-59. PubMed ID: 8551192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Within-session rates of responding when reinforcer magnitude is changed within the session.
    Weatherly JN; McSweeney FK; Swindell S
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jan; 131(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 14977028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP; Blampied NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revealed preference between reinforcers used to examine hypotheses about behavioral consistencies.
    Tustin D
    Behav Modif; 2000 Jul; 24(3):411-24. PubMed ID: 10881385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of reinforcer probability, delay, and response requirements on the choices of rats and pigeons: possible species differences.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 May; 83(3):263-79. PubMed ID: 16050037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reinforcer magnitude and demand under fixed-ratio schedules with domestic hens.
    Grant AA; Foster TM; Temple W; Jackson S; Kinloch J; Poling A
    Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():199-210. PubMed ID: 24393654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A behavioral economic analysis of concurrently available money and cigarettes.
    DeGrandpre RJ; Bickel WK; Higgins ST; Hughes JR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Mar; 61(2):191-201. PubMed ID: 8169568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing preference and reinforcer effectiveness in dogs.
    Vicars SM; Miguel CF; Sobie JL
    Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():75-83. PubMed ID: 24270051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.