These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17465355)

  • 1. Efficacy of clinical methods to assess jawbone tissue prior to and during endosseous dental implant placement: a systematic literature review.
    Ribeiro-Rotta RF; Lindh C; Rohlin M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):289-300. PubMed ID: 17465355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ambiguity in bone tissue characteristics as presented in studies on dental implant planning and placement: a systematic review.
    Ribeiro-Rotta RF; Lindh C; Pereira AC; Rohlin M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):789-801. PubMed ID: 21121957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the trabecular pattern before endosseous implant treatment: diagnostic outcome of periapical radiography in the mandible.
    Lindh C; Petersson A; Rohlin M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Sep; 82(3):335-43. PubMed ID: 8884836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 3. Bone quality evaluation during osteotomy and implant placement.
    Lee S; Gantes B; Riggs M; Crigger M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 17465345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A systematic review of methods to diagnose oral dryness and salivary gland function.
    Löfgren CD; Wickström C; Sonesson M; Lagunas PT; Christersson C
    BMC Oral Health; 2012 Aug; 12():29. PubMed ID: 22870895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Influence of Tactile Perception on Classification of Bone Tissue at Dental Implant Insertion.
    Linck GK; Ferreira GM; De Oliveira RC; Lindh C; Leles CR; Ribeiro-Rotta RF
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Jun; 18(3):601-8. PubMed ID: 25850635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of relationship between preoperative bone density values derived from cone beam computed tomography and implant stability parameters: a clinical study.
    Salimov F; Tatli U; Kürkçü M; Akoğlan M; Oztunç H; Kurtoğlu C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1016-21. PubMed ID: 23772811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Jaw bone density assessments of implant sites using spiral CT and Simplant software].
    Li FB; Yu LY; Cai YD; Xie C
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2009 Feb; 18(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 19290428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Revised, Computed Tomography-Based Lekholm and Zarb Jawbone Quality Classification.
    Al-Ekrish AA; Widmann G; Alfadda SA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(4):342-345. PubMed ID: 29953564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone density at implant sites and its relationship to assessment of bone quality and treatment outcome.
    Bergkvist G; Koh KJ; Sahlholm S; Klintström E; Lindh C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):321-8. PubMed ID: 20369091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Histomorphometrical and molecular evaluation of endosseous dental implants sites in humans: correlation with clinical and radiographic aspects.
    Pereira AC; Souza PP; Souza JA; Silva TA; Batista AC; Ribeiro-Rotta RF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Apr; 24(4):414-21. PubMed ID: 22092653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging add to temporomandibular joint disorder treatment? A systematic review of diagnostic efficacy.
    Ribeiro-Rotta RF; Marques KD; Pacheco MJ; Leles CR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Feb; 38(2):120-35. PubMed ID: 20678103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of age, jaw site, and bone condition on oral implant outcomes.
    Bryant SR
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(5):470-90. PubMed ID: 9922739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bone quality and quantity of the anterior maxillary trabecular bone in dental implant sites.
    Wakimoto M; Matsumura T; Ueno T; Mizukawa N; Yanagi Y; Iida S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1314-9. PubMed ID: 22151688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comprehensive and critical review of dental implant placement in diabetic animals and patients.
    Kotsovilis S; Karoussis IK; Fourmousis I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):587-99. PubMed ID: 16958701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quantitative cone-beam computerized tomography.
    Aranyarachkul P; Caruso J; Gantes B; Schulz E; Riggs M; Dus I; Yamada JM; Crigger M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):416-24. PubMed ID: 15973953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trabecular bone pattern of the mandible. Comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography.
    Taguchi A; Tanimoto K; Akagawa Y; Suei Y; Wada T; Rohlin M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Mar; 26(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 9442622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immediate placement of implants into infected sites: a systematic review of the literature.
    Waasdorp JA; Evian CI; Mandracchia M
    J Periodontol; 2010 Jun; 81(6):801-8. PubMed ID: 20192616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.
    Wallace SS; Froum SJ
    Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 1. Quantitative computed tomography.
    Shahlaie M; Gantes B; Schulz E; Riggs M; Crigger M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):224-31. PubMed ID: 12705300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.