238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17466495)
21. Bayesian approach to feature selection and parameter tuning for support vector machine classifiers.
Gold C; Holub A; Sollich P
Neural Netw; 2005; 18(5-6):693-701. PubMed ID: 16111861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Relevance vector machine for optical diagnosis of cancer.
Majumder SK; Ghosh N; Gupta PK
Lasers Surg Med; 2005 Apr; 36(4):323-33. PubMed ID: 15825208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Optimal classification of long echo time in vivo magnetic resonance spectra in the detection of recurrent brain tumors.
Menze BH; Lichy MP; Bachert P; Kelm BM; Schlemmer HP; Hamprecht FA
NMR Biomed; 2006 Aug; 19(5):599-609. PubMed ID: 16642460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Tumour grading from magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a comparison of feature extraction with variable selection.
Huang Y; Lisboa PJ; El-Deredy W
Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(1):147-64. PubMed ID: 12486756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A wavelet-based optimal texture feature set for classification of brain tumours.
Sasikala M; Kumaravel N
J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 18432467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. ESVM: evolutionary support vector machine for automatic feature selection and classification of microarray data.
Huang HL; Chang FL
Biosystems; 2007; 90(2):516-28. PubMed ID: 17280775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. On the relevance of automatically selected single-voxel MRS and multimodal MRI and MRSI features for brain tumour differentiation.
Postma GJ; Luts J; Idema AJ; Julià-Sapé M; Moreno-Torres A; Gajewicz W; Suykens JA; Heerschap A; Van Huffel S; Buydens LM
Comput Biol Med; 2011 Feb; 41(2):87-97. PubMed ID: 21236418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A prototype decision support system for MR spectroscopy-assisted diagnosis of brain tumours.
Underwood J; Tate AR; Luckin R; Majós C; Capdevila A; Howe F; Griffiths J; Arús C
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):561-5. PubMed ID: 11604803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prediction of enological parameters and discrimination of rice wine age using least-squares support vector machines and near infrared spectroscopy.
Yu H; Lin H; Xu H; Ying Y; Li B; Pan X
J Agric Food Chem; 2008 Jan; 56(2):307-13. PubMed ID: 18167072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Quantitative combination of volumetric MR imaging and MR spectroscopy data for the discrimination of meningiomas from metastatic brain tumors by means of pattern recognition.
Georgiadis P; Kostopoulos S; Cavouras D; Glotsos D; Kalatzis I; Sifaki K; Malamas M; Solomou E; Nikiforidis G
Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 May; 29(4):525-35. PubMed ID: 21315534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Multiclass classification based on extended support vector data description.
Mu T; Nandi AK
IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2009 Oct; 39(5):1206-16. PubMed ID: 19336314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Discrimination of raw and processed Dipsacus asperoides by near infrared spectroscopy combined with least squares-support vector machine and random forests.
Xin N; Gu XF; Wu H; Hu YZ; Yang ZL
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc; 2012 Apr; 89():18-24. PubMed ID: 22240232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multivariate calibration with least-squares support vector machines.
Thissen U; Ustün B; Melssen WJ; Buydens LM
Anal Chem; 2004 Jun; 76(11):3099-105. PubMed ID: 15167788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predicting protein structural class by SVM with class-wise optimized features and decision probabilities.
Anand A; Pugalenthi G; Suganthan PN
J Theor Biol; 2008 Jul; 253(2):375-80. PubMed ID: 18423492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Malignancy assessment of brain tumours with magnetic resonance spectroscopy and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Fayed N; Dávila J; Medrano J; Olmos S
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):427-33. PubMed ID: 18442889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. MRS quality assessment in a multicentre study on MRS-based classification of brain tumours.
van der Graaf M; Julià-Sapé M; Howe FA; Ziegler A; Majós C; Moreno-Torres A; Rijpkema M; Acosta D; Opstad KS; van der Meulen YM; Arús C; Heerschap A
NMR Biomed; 2008 Feb; 21(2):148-58. PubMed ID: 17458918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A novel kernel-based maximum a posteriori classification method.
Xu Z; Huang K; Zhu J; King I; Lyu MR
Neural Netw; 2009 Sep; 22(7):977-87. PubMed ID: 19167865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Classification of electrocardiogram signals with support vector machines and particle swarm optimization.
Melgani F; Bazi Y
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2008 Sep; 12(5):667-77. PubMed ID: 18779082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bagging linear sparse Bayesian learning models for variable selection in cancer diagnosis.
Lu C; Devos A; Suykens JA; Arús C; Van Huffel S
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2007 May; 11(3):338-47. PubMed ID: 17521084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of pattern recognition methods in classifying high-resolution BOLD signals obtained at high magnetic field in monkeys.
Ku SP; Gretton A; Macke J; Logothetis NK
Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 26(7):1007-14. PubMed ID: 18691999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
