399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17466887)
1. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Grassl U; Schulze RK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast perception in digitized panoramic radiographs compared with their film-based origin.
Schulze RK; Rosing ST; D'Hoedt B
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Sep; 94(3):388-94. PubMed ID: 12324798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct digital radiography in the dental office.
Wenzel A; Gröndahl HG
Int Dent J; 1995 Feb; 45(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 7607741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [A ROC analysis for comparing contrast perception in grey scale reversal of digital images].
Dölken W; Krahe T; Landwehr P; Horwitz AE; Lackner K
Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jan; 1(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 2018803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of K-shell absorption edge filters on image quality in digital intraoral radiography.
Shibuya H; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Sep; 90(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 10982962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of bit depth and kVp of digital radiography for detection of subtle differences.
Heo MS; Choi DH; Benavides E; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Lee SS; Choi SC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 19272812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the response of storage phosphor and film radiography to small variations in X-ray exposure.
Hildebolt CF; Fletcher G; Yokoyama-Crothers N; Conover GL; Vannier MW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9442600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Receiver operating characteristics of RadioVisioGraphy.
Dagenais ME; Clark BG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Feb; 79(2):238-45. PubMed ID: 7614189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical study of the sensitivity and dynamic range of three digital systems, E-speed film and digitized film.
Bóscolo FN; Oliveira AE; Almeida SM; Haiter CF; Haiter Neto F
Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 11696917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
Borg E
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
Anissi HD; Geibel MA
Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative determination of radio-opacity: equivalence of digital and film X-ray systems.
Nomoto R; Mishima A; Kobayashi K; McCabe JF; Darvell BW; Watts DC; Momoi Y; Hirano S
Dent Mater; 2008 Jan; 24(1):141-7. PubMed ID: 17923153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the detectability of high- and low-contrast details on a TFT screen and a CRT screen designed for radiologic diagnosis.
Kotter E; Bley TA; Saueressig U; Fisch D; Springer O; Winterer JT; Schaefer O; Langer M
Invest Radiol; 2003 Nov; 38(11):719-24. PubMed ID: 14566182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Skeletal surveys for child abuse: comparison of interpretation using digitized images and screen-film radiographs.
Youmans DC; Don S; Hildebolt C; Shackelford GD; Luker GD; McAlister WH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1415-9. PubMed ID: 9798889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography.
Kullendorff B; Nilsson M; Rohlin M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Sep; 82(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 8884837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computed dental radiography: evaluation of a new charge-coupled device-based intraoral radiographic system.
Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Schick DB; Rumack PM
Quintessence Int; 1995 Jun; 26(6):399-404. PubMed ID: 8602420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.
Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L
Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
