399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17466887)
21. Interpretation accuracy of a CCD film digitizer.
Gitlin JN; Scott WW; Bell K; Narayan A
J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 12105698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Image contrast in various cassette-screen-film combinations].
Barth HH; Grasser H
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Dec; 40(12):1230-4. PubMed ID: 3869536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for proximal caries detection.
Harase Y; Araki K; Okano T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):791-6. PubMed ID: 16731402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [The measurement parameters in dental radiography: a comparison between traditional and digital technics].
Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Nessi R; Gagliani M; Uslenghi CM
Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 8643845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. RVG-S, VIXA, and Ektaspeed film in detection of proximal enamel defects under orthodontic bands.
Reichl P; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 8678348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Intraoral digital radiography.
Alder ME
Tex Dent J; 1995 Feb; 112(2):31-5. PubMed ID: 8633303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems.
Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 9927091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radiopacity evaluation of new root canal filling materials by digitalization of images.
Tanomaru-Filho M; Jorge EG; Guerreiro Tanomaru JM; Gonçalves M
J Endod; 2007 Mar; 33(3):249-51. PubMed ID: 17320706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Image quality of digital and film radiographs in applications sent to the Dental Insurance Office in Sweden for treatment approval.
Hellén-Halme K; Johansson PM; Håkansson J; Petersson A
Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 15272512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay.
Nair MK; Ludlow JB; May KN; Nair UP; Johnson MP; Close JM
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In vitro carious lesion detection on D-, E-, and F-speed radiographic films.
Schulze RK; Nackat D; D'hoedt B
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Apr; 97(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 15088040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnosis of artificially induced external root resorption using conventional intraoral film radiography, CCD, and PSP: an ex vivo study.
Kamburoğlu K; Tsesis I; Kfir A; Kaffe I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Dec; 106(6):885-91. PubMed ID: 18547837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Linear and logarithmic subtraction for detecting enamel subsurface demineralization.
Haiter-Neto F; Ferreira RI; Tabchoury CP; Bóscolo FN
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 15897282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Salvaging dark dental radiographs.
Winstanley TD
Dent Update; 1996; 23(6):246, 249. PubMed ID: 9084254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Depiction of low-contrast detail in digital radiography: comparison of powder- and needle-structured storage phosphor systems.
Körner M; Treitl M; Schaetzing R; Pfeifer KJ; Reiser M; Wirth S
Invest Radiol; 2006 Jul; 41(7):593-9. PubMed ID: 16772853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Direct digital radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: a clinical study.
Kullendorff B; Petersson K; Rohlin M
Endod Dent Traumatol; 1997 Aug; 13(4):183-9. PubMed ID: 9550045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
Doyle P; Finney L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Added value of breathhold diffusion-weighted MRI in detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma lesions compared with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI alone using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Xu PJ; Yan FH; Wang JH; Lin J; Ji Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Feb; 29(2):341-9. PubMed ID: 19161186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
Goga R; Chandler NP; Love RM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15314002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The effect of technical parameters on diagnostic quality].
Brandt GA
Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jan; 1(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 2018801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
