BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1629 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17467435)

  • 1. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
    Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemodynamic comparison of bioprostheses for complete supra-annular position in patients with small aortic annulus.
    Botzenhardt F; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Guenzinger R; Wagner IM; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jun; 45(12):2054-60. PubMed ID: 15963409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
    Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The complete supraannular concept: in vivo hemodynamics of bovine and porcine aortic bioprostheses.
    Ruzicka DJ; Hettich I; Hutter A; Bleiziffer S; Badiu CC; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R; Eichinger WB
    Circulation; 2009 Sep; 120(11 Suppl):S139-45. PubMed ID: 19752359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position.
    Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Keithahn A; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 May; 13(3):382-8; discussion 388-9. PubMed ID: 15222284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna bioprosthesis: a stented valve with stentless performance?
    Totaro P; Degno N; Zaidi A; Youhana A; Argano V
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Dec; 130(6):1668-74. PubMed ID: 16308014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
    Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves.
    Bove EL; Marvasti MA; Potts JL; Reger MJ; Zamora JL; Eich RH; Parker FB
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):750-5. PubMed ID: 4058047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective randomized comparison of the Medtronic Advantage Supra and St Jude Medical Regent mechanical heart valves in the aortic position: is there an additional benefit of supra-annular valve positioning?
    Guenzinger R; Eichinger WB; Hettich I; Bleiziffer S; Ruzicka D; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Aug; 136(2):462-71. PubMed ID: 18692658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemodynamic evaluation of the Sorin Soprano bioprosthesis in the completely supra-annular aortic position.
    Eichinger WB; Botzenhardt F; Wagner I; Bleiziffer S; Ruzicka DJ; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):822-7. PubMed ID: 16359065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of early hemodynamic performance of 3 aortic valve bioprostheses.
    Ugur M; Suri RM; Daly RC; Dearani JA; Park SJ; Joyce LD; Burkhart HM; Greason KL; Schaff HV
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1940-6. PubMed ID: 24530199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna valve versus Medtronic Hancock II: a matched hemodynamic comparison.
    Borger MA; Nette AF; Maganti M; Feindel CM
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Jun; 83(6):2054-8. PubMed ID: 17532395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter.
    Ruzicka DJ; Eichinger WB; Hettich IM; Bleiziffer S; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The subcoronary Toronto stentless versus supra-annular Perimount stented replacement aortic valve: early clinical and hemodynamic results of a randomized comparison in 160 patients.
    Chambers JB; Rimington HM; Hodson F; Rajani R; Blauth CI
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 131(4):878-2. PubMed ID: 16580447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemodynamic performance and incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch of the complete supraannular perimount magna bioprosthesis in the aortic position.
    Botzenhardt F; Eichinger WB; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Wagner I; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 53(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 16037868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Results of aortic valve replacement with a new supra-annular pericardial stented bioprosthesis.
    Pavoni D; Badano LP; Musumeci SF; Frassani R; Gianfagna P; Mazzaro E; Livi U
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Dec; 82(6):2133-8. PubMed ID: 17126124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relation between size of prosthesis and valve gradient: comparison of two aortic bioprosthesis.
    Seitelberger R; Bialy J; Gottardi R; Seebacher G; Moidl R; Mittelböck M; Simon P; Wolner E
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 15019661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stentless aortic valves are hemodynamically superior to stented valves during mid-term follow-up: a large retrospective study.
    Borger MA; Carson SM; Ivanov J; Rao V; Scully HE; Feindel CM; David TE
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Dec; 80(6):2180-5. PubMed ID: 16305867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves.
    Cosgrove DM; Lytle BW; Gill CC; Golding LA; Stewart RW; Loop FD; Williams GW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Mar; 89(3):358-68. PubMed ID: 3974271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the effects of aortic valve replacement using 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis and 19-mm Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis.
    Tanigawa K; Eishi K; Yamachika S; Hashizume K; Tada S; Yamane K; Izumi K; Takai H; Miura T; Nakaji S
    Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 14(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 18414344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 82.