These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17467671)

  • 1. Deafness and visual enumeration: not all aspects of attention are modified by deafness.
    Hauser PC; Dye MW; Boutla M; Green CS; Bavelier D
    Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 1153():178-87. PubMed ID: 17467671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response bias reveals enhanced attention to inferior visual field in signers of American Sign Language.
    Dye MW; Seymour JL; Hauser PC
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Apr; 234(4):1067-76. PubMed ID: 26708522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which aspects of visual attention are changed by deafness? The case of the Attentional Network Test.
    Dye MW; Baril DE; Bavelier D
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(8):1801-11. PubMed ID: 17291549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual memory for shapes in deaf signers and nonsigners and in hearing signers and nonsigners: atypical lateralization and enhancement.
    Cattani A; Clibbens J; Perfect TJ
    Neuropsychology; 2007 Jan; 21(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 17201534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual field asymmetries for motion processing in deaf and hearing signers.
    Bosworth RG; Dobkins KR
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):170-81. PubMed ID: 12027401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of early deafness and early exposure to sign language on the cerebral organization for motion processing.
    Bavelier D; Brozinsky C; Tomann A; Mitchell T; Neville H; Liu G
    J Neurosci; 2001 Nov; 21(22):8931-42. PubMed ID: 11698604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of attention and laterality on motion and orientation discrimination in deaf signers.
    Bosworth RG; Petrich JA; Dobkins KR
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 23455437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sign language experience redistributes attentional resources to the inferior visual field.
    Stoll C; Dye MWG
    Cognition; 2019 Oct; 191():103957. PubMed ID: 31255921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in the spatial distribution of visual attention after early deafness.
    Proksch J; Bavelier D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Jul; 14(5):687-701. PubMed ID: 12167254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Altered spatial distribution of visual attention in near and far space after early deafness.
    Chen Q; He G; Chen K; Jin Z; Mo L
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2693-8. PubMed ID: 20478322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhanced reactivity to visual stimuli in deaf individuals.
    Bottari D; Nava E; Ley P; Pavani F
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2010; 28(2):167-79. PubMed ID: 20404406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing the effects of auditory deprivation and sign language within the auditory and visual cortex.
    Fine I; Finney EM; Boynton GM; Dobkins KR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 17(10):1621-37. PubMed ID: 16269101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cross-modal integration and plastic changes revealed by lip movement, random-dot motion and sign languages in the hearing and deaf.
    Sadato N; Okada T; Honda M; Matsuki K; Yoshida M; Kashikura K; Takei W; Sato T; Kochiyama T; Yonekura Y
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Aug; 15(8):1113-22. PubMed ID: 15563723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory deprivation affects biases of visuospatial attention as measured by line bisection.
    Cattaneo Z; Lega C; Cecchetto C; Papagno C
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Sep; 232(9):2767-73. PubMed ID: 24770861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motion velocity thresholds in deaf signers: changes in lateralization but not in overall sensitivity.
    Brozinsky CJ; Bavelier D
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 21(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 15325408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The sign superiority effect: Lexical status facilitates peripheral handshape identification for deaf signers.
    Schotter ER; Johnson E; Lieberman AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1397-1410. PubMed ID: 32940493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do deaf individuals see better?
    Bavelier D; Dye MW; Hauser PC
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Nov; 10(11):512-8. PubMed ID: 17015029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of spatial attention on motion processing in deaf signers, hearing signers, and hearing nonsigners.
    Bosworth RG; Dobkins KR
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):152-69. PubMed ID: 12027400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Category selectivity of the N170 and the role of expertise in deaf signers.
    Mitchell TV
    Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 343():150-161. PubMed ID: 27770622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Iconicity in spatial language guides visual attention: A comparison between signers' and speakers' eye gaze during message preparation.
    Manhardt F; Özyürek A; Sümer B; Mulder K; Karadöller DZ; Brouwer S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1735-1753. PubMed ID: 32352819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.