BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17468097)

  • 21. Population survey of attitudes and beliefs regarding organic, genetically modified, and irradiated foods.
    Gwira Baumblatt JA; Carpenter LR; Wiedeman C; Dunn JR; Schaffner W; Jones TF
    Nutr Health; 2017 Mar; 23(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 28298152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Nutrition and health--genetically modified food].
    Kuiper HA; Kleter GA; Kok EJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Jan; 147(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 12602068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Public stigma in health and non-healthcare students: attributions, emotions and willingness to help with adolescent self-harm.
    Law GU; Rostill-Brookes H; Goodman D
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Jan; 46(1):107-18. PubMed ID: 18962601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. There are gender differences in attitudes toward surrogacy when information on this technique is provided.
    Minai J; Suzuki K; Takeda Y; Hoshi K; Yamagata Z
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Jun; 132(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 17046144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Public health issues related with the consumption of food obtained from genetically modified organisms.
    Paparini A; Romano-Spica V
    Biotechnol Annu Rev; 2004; 10():85-122. PubMed ID: 15504704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attitudes, perceptions, and trust. Insights from a consumer survey regarding genetically modified banana in Uganda.
    Kikulwe EM; Wesseler J; Falck-Zepeda J
    Appetite; 2011 Oct; 57(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 21704665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An empirical test of competing theories of hazard-related trust: the case of GM food.
    Allum N
    Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):935-46. PubMed ID: 17958502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Attitudes of the public and scientists to biotechnology in Japan at the start of 2000.
    Ng MA; Takeda C; Watanabe T; Macer D
    Eubios J Asian Int Bioeth; 2000 Jul; 10(4):106-13. PubMed ID: 16273712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genetically modified plants and food hypersensitivity diseases: usage and implications of experimental models for risk assessment.
    Prescott VE; Hogan SP
    Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Aug; 111(2):374-83. PubMed ID: 16364445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Strategies to evaluate the safety of bioengineered foods.
    Delaney B
    Int J Toxicol; 2007; 26(5):389-99. PubMed ID: 17963126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology and the role of second generation technologies in the USA and Europe.
    Lusk JL; Rozan A
    Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):386-7. PubMed ID: 15953650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Swedish farmers attitudes, expectations and fears in relation to growing genetically modified crops.
    Lehrman A; Johnson K
    Environ Biosafety Res; 2008; 7(3):153-62. PubMed ID: 18801325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The gap between science and perception: the case of plant biotechnology in Europe.
    Einsele A
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():1-11. PubMed ID: 17522817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Gender and food, a study of attitudes in the USA towards organic, local, U.S. grown, and GM-free foods.
    Bellows AC; Alcaraz V G; Hallman WK
    Appetite; 2010 Dec; 55(3):540-50. PubMed ID: 20851727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A cross-sectional study of biotechnology awareness and teaching in European high schools.
    Vanderschuren H; Heinzmann D; Faso C; Stupak M; Arga KY; Hoerzer H; Laizet Y; Leduchowska P; Silva N; Simková K
    N Biotechnol; 2010 Dec; 27(6):822-8. PubMed ID: 20178865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Use of functional foods among Swedish consumers is related to health-consciousness and perceived effect.
    Landström E; Hursti UK; Becker W; Magnusson M
    Br J Nutr; 2007 Nov; 98(5):1058-69. PubMed ID: 17640416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Risky eating behaviors of young adults-implications for food safety education.
    Byrd-Bredbenner C; Abbot JM; Wheatley V; Schaffner D; Bruhn C; Blalock L
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2008 Mar; 108(3):549-52. PubMed ID: 18313439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An Asian perspective on GMO and biotechnology issues.
    Teng PP
    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():237-40. PubMed ID: 18296345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Risk assessment of genetically modified crops for nutrition and health.
    Magaña-Gómez JA; de la Barca AM
    Nutr Rev; 2009 Jan; 67(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19146501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Who does the public trust? The case of genetically modified food in the United States.
    Lang JT; Hallman WK
    Risk Anal; 2005 Oct; 25(5):1241-52. PubMed ID: 16297228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.