144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17468375)
1. The sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital stereoscopic retinal imaging in detecting diabetic retinopathy: response to Ahmed et al.
Raman R; Rani PK; Sharma T
Diabetes Care; 2007 May; 30(5):e47. PubMed ID: 17468375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital stereoscopic retinal imaging in detecting diabetic retinopathy.
Ahmed J; Ward TP; Bursell SE; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Vigersky RA
Diabetes Care; 2006 Oct; 29(10):2205-9. PubMed ID: 17003294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography.
Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers RJ; Grosvenor DM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 134(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 12140027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in rural area using single-field, digital fundus images.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Wongcumchang N; Surawongsin P; Panyawatananukul E; Tiensuwan M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Feb; 88(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 15962667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of single-field nonmydriatic digital fundus image in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Suansilpong A; Rawdaree P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1397-403. PubMed ID: 18843870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography.
Aptel F; Denis P; Rouberol F; Thivolet C
Diabetes Metab; 2008 Jun; 34(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18406188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal imaging for screening diabetic retinopathy.
Lopez-Bastida J; Cabrera-Lopez F; Serrano-Aguilar P
Diabet Med; 2007 Apr; 24(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 17298591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment.
Schiffman RM; Jacobsen G; Nussbaum JJ; Desai UR; Carey JD; Glasser D; Zimmer-Galler IE; Zeimer R; Goldberg MF
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 15688971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonmydriatic widefield retinal imaging with an automatic white LED confocal imaging system compared with dilated ophthalmoscopy in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Borrelli E; Querques L; Lattanzio R; Cavalleri M; Grazioli Moretti A; Di Biase C; Signorino A; Gelormini F; Sacconi R; Bandello F; Querques G
Acta Diabetol; 2020 Sep; 57(9):1043-1047. PubMed ID: 32246268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonmydriatic digital retinal images for determining diabetic retinopathy.
Tanterdtham J; Singalavanija A; Namatra C; Trinavarat A; Rodanant N; Bamroongsuk P; Thoongsuwan S; Euasobhon W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Mar; 90(3):508-12. PubMed ID: 17427528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Stereoscopic nonmydriatic digital-video interest for screening the diabetic retinopathy].
Angioi-Duprez K; Guerci B; Maalouf T; Drouin P
Diabetes Metab; 2002 Jun; 28(3):242-3. PubMed ID: 12149606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The photographic screening for retinopathy of prematurity study (photo-ROP). Primary outcomes.
Photographic Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity (Photo-ROP) Cooperative Group
Retina; 2008 Mar; 28(3 Suppl):S47-54. PubMed ID: 18317345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a computer-aided diagnosis system for diabetic retinopathy screening on public data.
Sánchez CI; Niemeijer M; Dumitrescu AV; Suttorp-Schulten MS; Abràmoff MD; van Ginneken B
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 52(7):4866-71. PubMed ID: 21527381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Importance of fundus oculi studies using transformed light for detecting the early signs of diabetic retinopathy].
Vodovozov AM
Oftalmol Zh; 1985; (4):207-8. PubMed ID: 4047568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A pilot study to detect glaucoma with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy compared with nonmydriatic stereoscopic photography in a community health screening.
Ohkubo S; Takeda H; Higashide T; Sasaki T; Sugiyama K
J Glaucoma; 2007 Sep; 16(6):531-8. PubMed ID: 17873714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The accuracy of digital-video retinal imaging to screen for diabetic retinopathy: an analysis of two digital-video retinal imaging systems using standard stereoscopic seven-field photography and dilated clinical examination as reference standards.
Lawrence MG
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2004; 102():321-40. PubMed ID: 15747766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. National screening programme for diabetic retinopathy. Screening by optometrists is better than screening by fundus photography.
Prasad S; Swindlehurst H; Cleaqrkin LG
BMJ; 2001 Oct; 323(7319):998-9. PubMed ID: 11700632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated grading for diabetic retinopathy: a large-scale audit using arbitration by clinical experts.
Fleming AD; Goatman KA; Philip S; Prescott GJ; Sharp PF; Olson JA
Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Dec; 94(12):1606-10. PubMed ID: 20858722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrawide angle angiography for the detection and management of diabetic retinopathy.
Kaines A; Oliver S; Reddy S; Schwartz SD
Int Ophthalmol Clin; 2009; 49(2):53-9. PubMed ID: 19349786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital fundus image grading with the non-mydriatic Visucam(PRO NM) versus the FF450(plus) camera in diabetic retinopathy.
Neubauer AS; Rothschuh A; Ulbig MW; Blum M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 17944975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
