These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17469238)
1. RAND study first to document costs and fiscal impact of a mental health court. Psychiatr Serv; 2007 Apr; 58(4):577. PubMed ID: 17469238 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Helping mentally ill criminals: jailing offenders with mental illnesses serves no one, but new policies and funding are bringing about needed changes. Lyons D State Legis; 2007 Apr; 33(4):14-7. PubMed ID: 17431970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Community-based forensic evaluation. Fitch WL; Warren JI Int J Law Psychiatry; 1988; 11(4):359-70. PubMed ID: 3248915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Avoiding jail pays off: diverting people with mental illnesses out of prison takes commitment from the community along with adequate funding. Steverman S; Lubin T State Legis; 2007 Apr; 33(4):20-1. PubMed ID: 17431968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Courts as gatekeepers in managed care settings. Petrila J Health Aff (Millwood); 1998; 17(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 9558788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Financial aspects of court-ordered evaluations. Goldberg EE; Kazim A; Bay C Psychiatr Serv; 2002 May; 53(5):620-1. PubMed ID: 11986514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A capitated payment system for involuntary mental health clients. McFarland BH; Bigelow DA; Smith JC; Hornbrook MC; Mofidi A; Payton P Health Aff (Millwood); 1995; 14(3):220-31. PubMed ID: 7498894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the effectiveness of jail diversion programs for persons with serious mental illness and co-occurring substance use disorders. Steadman HJ; Naples M Behav Sci Law; 2005; 23(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 15818607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using fiscal data to identify heavy service users. Hadley TR; McGurrin MC; Pulice RT; Holohean EJ Psychiatr Q; 1990; 61(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 2201053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Adapting a substance abuse court diversion model for felony offenders with co-occurring disorders: initial implementation. Broner N; Nguyen H; Swern A; Goldfinger S Psychiatr Q; 2003; 74(4):361-85. PubMed ID: 14686460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The importance of early detection and diversion of mental ill offenders to avoid prison sentences. Duggan S Rev Esp Sanid Penit; 2016 Oct; 18(2):40-2. PubMed ID: 27637101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. More research into why detentions under the Mental Health Act. Stafford N Ment Health Today; 2012; ():22. PubMed ID: 23304881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Effect of commitment of mentally ill on their fate]. Góraj A Psychiatr Pol; 1982; 16(1-2):39-44. PubMed ID: 7146205 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Service organisation, service use and costs of community mental health care. Schneider J; Wooff D; Carpenter J; Brandon T; McNiven F J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Jun; 5(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 12529563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Decentralized services for public hospital patients: a cost analysis. Santos AB; Thrasher JW; Ballenger JC Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1988 Aug; 39(8):827-9. PubMed ID: 3209197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A community ability scale for chronically mentally ill consumers: Part II. Applications. Barker S; Barron N; McFarland BH; Bigelow DA; Carnahan T Community Ment Health J; 1994 Oct; 30(5):459-72. PubMed ID: 7851100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of restrictive civil commitment procedures on a prison psychiatric service. Bonovitz JC; Guy EB Am J Psychiatry; 1979 Aug; 136(8):1045-8. PubMed ID: 464129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The least restrictive alternative in the postinstitutional era. Munetz MR; Geller JL Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1993 Oct; 44(10):967-73. PubMed ID: 8225278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]