These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17469918)

  • 1. Sex differences in cue perception in a visual scene: investigation of cue type.
    Barkley CL; Gabriel KI
    Behav Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 121(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 17469918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex differences in directional cue use in a virtual landscape.
    Chai XJ; Jacobs LF
    Behav Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 123(2):276-83. PubMed ID: 19331451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
    McDonald JJ; Green JJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of cue types on sex differences in human spatial memory.
    Chai XJ; Jacobs LF
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 208(2):336-42. PubMed ID: 19963014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of reference frames and number of cues available on the spatial orientation of males and females in a virtual memory task.
    Cánovas R; García RF; Cimadevilla JM
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 216(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 20655953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Differential visual attention scales directed by location versus semantic cue].
    Gao WB; Wei JH; Peng XH; Luo YJ
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2003 Feb; 16(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 12728955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of characteristics of target cues on task interference from prospective memory.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Jackson T; Yang H
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 18978643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cue repetition increases inhibition of return.
    Dukewich KR; Boehnke SE
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Dec; 448(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 18973792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural correlates of cue retrieval, task set reconfiguration, and rule mapping in the explicit cue task switching paradigm.
    Travers S; West R
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Jul; 45(4):588-601. PubMed ID: 18282198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex differences in a landmark environmental re-orientation task only during the learning phase.
    Piccardi L; Bianchini F; Iasevoli L; Giannone G; Guariglia C
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Oct; 503(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 21889578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidental learning of secondary attentional cueing.
    Navon D; Kasten R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):459-75. PubMed ID: 17927945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Desert ants benefit from combining visual and olfactory landmarks.
    Steck K; Hansson BS; Knaden M
    J Exp Biol; 2011 Apr; 214(Pt 8):1307-12. PubMed ID: 21430208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multisensory determinants of orientation perception: task-specific sex differences.
    Barnett-Cowan M; Dyde RT; Thompson C; Harris LR
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1899-907. PubMed ID: 20584195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inhibition of orienting during a memory-guided saccade task shows a Mexican-hat distribution.
    Finke C; Ostendorf F; Martus P; Braun M; Ploner CJ
    Neuroscience; 2008 Apr; 153(1):189-95. PubMed ID: 18358628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Location and features of instructive spatial cues do not influence the time course of covert shifts of visual spatial attention.
    Müller MM
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Mar; 77(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 18083290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender differences in landmark learning for virtual navigation: the role of distance to a goal.
    Chamizo VD; Artigas AA; Sansa J; Banterla F
    Behav Processes; 2011 Sep; 88(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 21736927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early-life malnutrition selectively retards the development of distal- but not proximal-cue navigation.
    Castro CA; Rudy JW
    Dev Psychobiol; 1987 Sep; 20(5):521-37. PubMed ID: 3678617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitive maps and attention.
    Hardt O; Nadel L
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():181-94. PubMed ID: 19733757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simon effect with and without awareness of the accessory stimulus.
    Treccani B; Umiltà C; Tagliabue M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):268-86. PubMed ID: 16634670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost.
    Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A; Demanet J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 17352616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.