BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17469961)

  • 21. Preexposure effects in the spatial domain: Dissociation between latent inhibition and perceptual learning.
    Prados J; Artigas AA; Sansa J
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Apr; 33(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 17469960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Categorical learning between 'male' and 'female' photographic human faces in jungle crows (Corvus macrorhynchos).
    Bogale BA; Aoyama M; Sugita S
    Behav Processes; 2011 Jan; 86(1):109-18. PubMed ID: 20971169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of preexposure on stimulus discrimination: an investigation of the mechanisms responsible for human perceptual learning.
    Lavis Y; Mitchell C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Dec; 59(12):2083-101. PubMed ID: 17095489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Semantic learning modifies perceptual face processing.
    Heisz JJ; Shedden JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1127-34. PubMed ID: 18752406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Human perceptual learning: the effect of pre-exposure schedule depends on task demands.
    Angulo R; Alonso G
    Behav Processes; 2012 Nov; 91(3):244-52. PubMed ID: 23022603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Learning faces: similar comparator faces do not improve performance.
    Jones SP; Dwyer DM; Lewis MB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e0116707. PubMed ID: 25590574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Similarity effects in face recognition.
    Davies GM; Shepherd JW; Ellis HD
    Am J Psychol; 1979 Sep; 92(3):507-23. PubMed ID: 517679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dominance of global visual properties at birth.
    Cassia VM; Simion F; Milani I; Umiltà C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Sep; 131(3):398-411. PubMed ID: 12214754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attentional changes in human perceptual learning.
    Angulo R; Alonso G
    Behav Processes; 2013 Sep; 98():61-8. PubMed ID: 23707891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Age of acquisition, not word frequency affects object recognition: evidence from the effects of visual degradation.
    Catling JC; Dent K; Williamson S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 18599003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perceiving, imaging, and preferring physiognomic stimuli.
    Lindauer MS
    Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(2):233-55. PubMed ID: 3766816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Learning to become an expert: reinforcement learning and the acquisition of perceptual expertise.
    Krigolson OE; Pierce LJ; Holroyd CB; Tanaka JW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1834-41. PubMed ID: 18823237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of aging and exposure duration on perceptual biases in chimeric face processing.
    Butler SH; Harvey M
    Cortex; 2008 Jun; 44(6):665-72. PubMed ID: 18472036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Attention alters visual plasticity during exposure-based learning.
    Gutnisky DA; Hansen BJ; Iliescu BF; Dragoi V
    Curr Biol; 2009 Apr; 19(7):555-60. PubMed ID: 19268592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Picture processing in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).
    Truppa V; Spinozzi G; Stegagno T; Fagot J
    Behav Processes; 2009 Oct; 82(2):140-52. PubMed ID: 19501136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Configural processing of other-race faces is delayed but not decreased.
    Wiese H; Stahl J; Schweinberger SR
    Biol Psychol; 2009 May; 81(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 19428974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of partial occlusion on newborns' face preference and recognition.
    Gava L; Valenza E; Turati C; de Schonen S
    Dev Sci; 2008 Jul; 11(4):563-74. PubMed ID: 18576964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pigeons use item-specific and category-level information in the identification and categorization of human faces.
    Loidolt M; Aust U; Meran I; Huber L
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Oct; 29(4):261-76. PubMed ID: 14570515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Enhanced discrimination between flavor stimuli: roles of salience modulation and inhibition.
    Artigas AA; Sansa J; Blair CA; Hall G; Prados J
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Apr; 32(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 16634660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is family special to the brain? An event-related fMRI study of familiar, familial, and self-face recognition.
    Platek SM; Kemp SM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):849-58. PubMed ID: 19159636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.