These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17469980)
1. Toward a psychophysics of agency: detecting gain and loss of control over auditory action effects. Repp BH; Knoblich G J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):469-82. PubMed ID: 17469980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Who is causing what? The sense of agency is relational and efferent-triggered. Engbert K; Wohlschläger A; Haggard P Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):693-704. PubMed ID: 17825813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training. Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hearing a melody in different ways: multistability of metrical interpretation, reflected in rate limits of sensorimotor synchronization. Repp BH Cognition; 2007 Mar; 102(3):434-54. PubMed ID: 16545791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Action observation modulates auditory perception of the consequence of others' actions. Sato A Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1219-27. PubMed ID: 18299207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence for reduced domain-specificity in auditory processing in autism. Järvinen-Pasley A; Heaton P Dev Sci; 2007 Nov; 10(6):786-93. PubMed ID: 17973796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The experience of agency in sequence production with altered auditory feedback. Couchman JJ; Beasley R; Pfordresher PQ Conscious Cogn; 2012 Mar; 21(1):186-203. PubMed ID: 22056210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Priming and authorship ascription: when nonconscious goals turn into conscious experiences of self-agency. Aarts H; Custers R; Marien H J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 May; 96(5):967-79. PubMed ID: 19379030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Separate contributions of enhanced and suppressed sensitivity to the auditory attentional filter. Tan MN; Robertson D; Hammond GR Hear Res; 2008 Jul; 241(1-2):18-25. PubMed ID: 18524512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does the sight of physical threat induce a tactile processing bias? Modality-specific attentional facilitation induced by viewing threatening pictures. Van Damme S; Gallace A; Spence C; Crombez G; Moseley GL Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():100-6. PubMed ID: 19094970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The cocktail party problem. Haykin S; Chen Z Neural Comput; 2005 Sep; 17(9):1875-902. PubMed ID: 15992485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intention, attention and the temporal experience of action. Haggard P; Cole J Conscious Cogn; 2007 Jun; 16(2):211-20. PubMed ID: 16934490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selective integration of auditory-visual looming cues by humans. Cappe C; Thut G; Romei V; Murray MM Neuropsychologia; 2009 Mar; 47(4):1045-52. PubMed ID: 19041883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of age on auditory spatial attention in conditions of real and simulated spatial separation. Singh G; Pichora-Fuller MK; Schneider BA J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1294-305. PubMed ID: 18681615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attention to upside-down faces: An exception to the inversion effect. Bindemann M; Burton AM Vision Res; 2008 Nov; 48(25):2555-61. PubMed ID: 18809423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]