These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17470009)

  • 1. Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity.
    Kane MJ; Conway ARA; Miura TK; Colflesh GJH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):615-622. PubMed ID: 17470009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The concurrent validity of the N-back task as a working memory measure.
    Jaeggi SM; Buschkuehl M; Perrig WJ; Meier B
    Memory; 2010 May; 18(4):394-412. PubMed ID: 20408039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the division of working memory and long-term memory and their relation to intelligence: A latent variable approach.
    Unsworth N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 20022311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities.
    Ackerman PL; Beier ME; Boyle MO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Dec; 131(4):567-89. PubMed ID: 12500864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical utility of the N-back task in functional neuroimaging studies of working memory.
    Jacola LM; Willard VW; Ashford JM; Ogg RJ; Scoggins MA; Jones MM; Wu S; Conklin HM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(8):875-86. PubMed ID: 25252868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual differences in working memory, secondary memory, and fluid intelligence: evidence from the levels-of-processing span task.
    Rose NS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Dec; 67(4):260-270. PubMed ID: 24341741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning, working memory, and intelligence revisited.
    Tamez E; Myerson J; Hale S
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):240-5. PubMed ID: 18308483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speed and accuracy of accessing information in working memory: an individual differences investigation of focus switching.
    Unsworth N; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):616-30. PubMed ID: 18444760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Working memory deficits in multiple sclerosis: comparison between the n-back task and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test.
    Parmenter BA; Shucard JL; Benedict RH; Shucard DW
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2006 Sep; 12(5):677-87. PubMed ID: 16961949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural mechanisms of interference control underlie the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory span.
    Burgess GC; Gray JR; Conway ARA; Braver TS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):674-692. PubMed ID: 21787103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive predictors of a common multitasking ability: Contributions from working memory, attention control, and fluid intelligence.
    Redick TS; Shipstead Z; Meier ME; Montroy JJ; Hicks KL; Unsworth N; Kane MJ; Hambrick DZ; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Nov; 145(11):1473-1492. PubMed ID: 27797557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Construct validity of various verbal and visual memory tests.
    Larrabee GJ; Curtiss G
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 Aug; 17(4):536-47. PubMed ID: 7593474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional guidance by working memory differs by paradigm: an individual-differences approach.
    Dowd EW; Kiyonaga A; Egner T; Mitroff SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):704-12. PubMed ID: 25737257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between articulation time and memory performance in verbal and visuospatial tasks.
    Smyth MM; Scholey KA
    Br J Psychol; 1996 May; 87 ( Pt 2)():179-91. PubMed ID: 8673358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.
    Kane MJ; Bleckley MK; Conway AR; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2001 Jun; 130(2):169-83. PubMed ID: 11409097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decomposing the n-back task: An individual differences study using the reference-back paradigm.
    Rac-Lubashevsky R; Kessler Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Sep; 90():190-9. PubMed ID: 27425422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interference and facilitation in spatial working memory: age-associated differences in lure effects in the n-back paradigm.
    Schmiedek F; Li SC; Lindenberger U
    Psychol Aging; 2009 Mar; 24(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 19290752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Working memory training revisited: A multi-level meta-analysis of n-back training studies.
    Soveri A; Antfolk J; Karlsson L; Salo B; Laine M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1077-1096. PubMed ID: 28116702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span.
    Conlin JA; Gathercole SE; Adams JW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Nov; 58(8):1434-46. PubMed ID: 16365948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Taboo: working memory and mental control in an interactive task.
    Hansen WA; Goldinger SD
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 19827699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.