These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17470118)

  • 1. Quantitative interpretation of specific conductance frequency distributions in karst.
    Massei N; Mahler BJ; Bakalowicz M; Fournier M; Dupont JP
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(3):288-93. PubMed ID: 17470118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using nitrate to quantify quick flow in a karst aquifer.
    Mahler BJ; Garner BD
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(3):350-60. PubMed ID: 18800970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of karst aquifer spring flows with a gray system decomposition model.
    Hao Y; Yeh TC; Wang Y; Zhao Y
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 17257338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of flowpaths to a well and spring in a karst aquifer.
    Toran L; Herman EK; White WB
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 17470117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anthropogenic contaminants as tracers in an urbanizing karst aquifer.
    Mahler B; Massei N
    J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Apr; 91(1-2):81-106. PubMed ID: 17161500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nutrient dynamics as indicators of karst processes: comparison of the Chalk aquifer (Normandy, France) and the Edwards aquifer (Texas, U.S.A.).
    Mahler BJ; Valdes D; Musgrove M; Massei N
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 May; 98(1-2):36-49. PubMed ID: 18423785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Springflow hydrographs: eogenetic vs. telogenetic karst.
    Florea LJ; Vacher HL
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(3):352-61. PubMed ID: 16681516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating ground water recharge using flow models of perched karstic aquifers.
    Weiss M; Gvirtzman H
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(6):761-73. PubMed ID: 17973754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting conductance due to upconing using neural networks.
    Coppola EA; McLane CF; Poulton MM; Szidarovszky F; Magelky RD
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(6):827-36. PubMed ID: 16324004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of a numerical indicator of microbial contamination for karst springs.
    Butscher C; Auckenthaler A; Scheidler S; Huggenberger P
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 20180864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of a discrete-continuum model to karst aquifers in North China.
    Wu Q; Zhou W; Pan G; Ye S
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(3):453-61. PubMed ID: 19210558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Locating the zone of saline intrusion in a coastal karst aquifer using springflow data.
    Arfib B; de Marsily G; Ganoulis J
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 17257336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterisation of dissolved organic matter in karst spring waters using intrinsic fluorescence: relationship with infiltration processes.
    Mudarra M; Andreo B; Baker A
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Aug; 409(18):3448-62. PubMed ID: 21680013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Numerical modeling of atoll island hydrogeology.
    Bailey RT; Jenson JW; Olsen AE
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(2):184-96. PubMed ID: 19040433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A simple method for locating the fresh water-salt water interface using pressure data.
    Kim KY; Chon CM; Park KH
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(6):723-8. PubMed ID: 17973750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigation of transport processes inside karst aquifer by means of STATIS.
    Fournier M; Motelay-Massei A; Massei N; Aubert M; Bakalowicz M; Dupont JP
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 19210562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Particle transport in a karst aquifer: natural and artificial tracer experiments with bacteria, bacteriophages and microspheres.
    Auckenthaler A; Raso G; Huggenberger P
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(3):131-8. PubMed ID: 12227598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the MODFLOW-2005 Conduit Flow Process.
    Hill ME; Stewart MT; Martin A
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(4):549-59. PubMed ID: 20113361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multitracer test approach to characterize reactive transport in karst aquifers.
    Geyer T; Birk S; Licha T; Liedl R; Sauter M
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 17257337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of methods to estimate spring flows in a karst aquifer.
    Sepúlveda N
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(3):337-49. PubMed ID: 18800971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.