These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17470124)
1. Latin hypercube approach to estimate uncertainty in ground water vulnerability. Gurdak JJ; McCray JE; Thyne G; Qi SL Ground Water; 2007; 45(3):348-61. PubMed ID: 17470124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using orthogonal array sampling to cope with uncertainty in ground water problems. Baalousha H Ground Water; 2009; 47(5):709-13. PubMed ID: 19735309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uncertainty estimation of pathlines in ground water models. Stauffer F Ground Water; 2005; 43(6):843-9. PubMed ID: 16324006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using semivariogram parameter uncertainty in hydrogeological applications. Pardo-Igúzquiza E; Chica-Olmo M; Garcia-Soldado MJ; Luque-Espinar JA Ground Water; 2009; 47(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 18793202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Propagation of uncertainty in diffuse pollution into water quality predictions: application to the River Dender in Flanders, Belgium. Vandenberghe V; van Griensven A; Bauwens W; Vanrolleghem PA Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(3-4):347-54. PubMed ID: 15850208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vulnerability and risk evaluation of agricultural nitrogen pollution for Hungary's main aquifer using DRASTIC and GLEAMS models. Leone A; Ripa MN; Uricchio V; Deák J; Vargay Z J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90(10):2969-78. PubMed ID: 18054423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PRO-GRADE: GIS toolkits for ground water recharge and discharge estimation. Lin YF; Wang J; Valocchi AJ Ground Water; 2009; 47(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 18823400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incorporating uncertainty into predictions of diffuse-source phosphorus transfers (using readily available data). Murdoch EG; Whelan MJ; Grieve IC Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(3-4):339-46. PubMed ID: 15850207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A geographic data model for representing ground water systems. Strassberg G; Maidment DR; Jones NL Ground Water; 2007; 45(4):515-8. PubMed ID: 17600583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A hybrid artificial neural network-numerical model for ground water problems. Szidarovszky F; Coppola EA; Long J; Hall AD; Poulton MM Ground Water; 2007; 45(5):590-600. PubMed ID: 17760585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of uncertainties in agricultural working schedules and Monte-Carlo evaluation of the model input in basin-scale runoff model analysis of herbicides. Matsui Y; Inoue T; Matsushita T; Yamada T; Yamamoto M; Sumigama Y Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(3-4):329-37. PubMed ID: 15850206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fuzzy-stochastic characterization of site uncertainty and variability in groundwater flow and contaminant transport through a heterogeneous aquifer. Zhang K; Li H; Achari G J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 106(1-2):73-82. PubMed ID: 19217686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transboundary impacts on regional ground water modeling in Texas. Rainwater K; Stovall J; Frailey S; Urban L Ground Water; 2005; 43(5):706-16. PubMed ID: 16149966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimation of recharge from floods in disconnected stream-aquifer systems. Vázquez-Suñé E; Capino B; Abarca E; Carrera J Ground Water; 2007; 45(5):579-89. PubMed ID: 17760584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The synergistic powers of AEM and GIS geodatabase models in water resources studies. Steward DR; Bernard EA Ground Water; 2006; 44(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 16405466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uncertainty analysis of predicted disturbance from off-road vehicular traffic in complex landscapes at fort hood. Fang S; Wente S; Gertner GZ; Wang G; Anderson A Environ Manage; 2002 Aug; 30(2):199-208. PubMed ID: 12105761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using atmospheric tracers to reduce uncertainty in groundwater recharge areas. Starn JJ; Bagtzoglou AC; Robbins GA Ground Water; 2010; 48(6):858-68. PubMed ID: 21416662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identifying the potential loss of monitoring wells using an uncertainty analysis. Freedman VL; Waichler SR; Cole CR; Vermeul VR; Bergeron MP Ground Water; 2005; 43(6):916-25. PubMed ID: 16324012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sustainability of ground water quality considering land use changes and public health risks. Twarakavi NK; Kaluarachchi JJ J Environ Manage; 2006 Dec; 81(4):405-19. PubMed ID: 16600472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Integrated modelling under uncertainty in watershed-level assessment and management. Ham JH; Yoon CG; Jung KW; Jang JH Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):31-9. PubMed ID: 17978430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]