These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17470257)

  • 1. Decision structuring in important real-life choices.
    Galotti KM
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Apr; 18(4):320-5. PubMed ID: 17470257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Real-life decision making: parents choosing a first-grade placement.
    Galotti KM; Tinkelenberg CE
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(4):455-68. PubMed ID: 20066925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The description-experience gap in risky choice.
    Hertwig R; Erev I
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2009 Dec; 13(12):517-23. PubMed ID: 19836292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fast and frugal food choices: uncovering individual decision heuristics.
    Scheibehenne B; Miesler L; Todd PM
    Appetite; 2007 Nov; 49(3):578-89. PubMed ID: 17531348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feelings not forgone: underestimating affective reactions to what does not happen.
    Andrade EB; Van Boven L
    Psychol Sci; 2010 May; 21(5):706-11. PubMed ID: 20483850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preference reversal in multiattribute choice.
    Tsetsos K; Usher M; Chater N
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Oct; 117(4):1275-93. PubMed ID: 21038979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. People's intuitions about intuitive insight and intuitive choice.
    Inbar Y; Cone J; Gilovich T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Aug; 99(2):232-47. PubMed ID: 20658841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intuitive confidence: choosing between intuitive and nonintuitive alternatives.
    Simmons JP; Nelson LD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Aug; 135(3):409-28. PubMed ID: 16846272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Connecting terror management and dissonance theory: Evidence that mortality salience increases the preference for supporting information after decisions.
    Jonas E; Greenberg J; Frey D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Sep; 29(9):1181-9. PubMed ID: 15189612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of self-other decision making on regulatory focus and choice overload.
    Polman E
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 May; 102(5):980-93. PubMed ID: 22429272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ignorance- versus evidence-based decision making: a decision time analysis of the recognition heuristic.
    Hilbig BE; Pohl RF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1296-305. PubMed ID: 19686022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rigorously testing multialternative decision field theory against random utility models.
    Berkowitsch NA; Scheibehenne B; Rieskamp J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Jun; 143(3):1331-48. PubMed ID: 24364681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adolescent women's contraceptive decision making.
    Weisman CS; Plichta S; Nathanson CA; Chase GA; Ensminger ME; Robinson JC
    J Health Soc Behav; 1991 Jun; 32(2):130-44. PubMed ID: 1861049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving subjective decision making in health care administration.
    Chow CW; Haddad KM; Wong-Boren A
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1991; 36(2):191-210. PubMed ID: 10110406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expected utility violations evolve under status-based selection mechanisms.
    Dickson ES
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Oct; 254(3):650-4. PubMed ID: 18656491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring patient involvement in healthcare decision making across different education and functional health literacy groups.
    Smith SK; Dixon A; Trevena L; Nutbeam D; McCaffery KJ
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Dec; 69(12):1805-12. PubMed ID: 19846245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of phantom decoys on choices in cats.
    Scarpi D
    Anim Cogn; 2011 Jan; 14(1):127-36. PubMed ID: 20838836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Game relativity: how context influences strategic decision making.
    Vlaev I; Chater N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):131-49. PubMed ID: 16478346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation.
    Brown SD; Heathcote A
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 Nov; 57(3):153-78. PubMed ID: 18243170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting risk sensitivity in humans and lower animals: risk as variance or coefficient of variation.
    Weber EU; Shafir S; Blais AR
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Apr; 111(2):430-45. PubMed ID: 15065916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.