These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17470261)

  • 1. Processing of invisible stimuli: advantage of upright faces and recognizable words in overcoming interocular suppression.
    Jiang Y; Costello P; He S
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Apr; 18(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 17470261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Specificity of face processing without awareness.
    Zhou G; Zhang L; Liu J; Yang J; Qu Z
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):408-12. PubMed ID: 20116293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of inversion and eye displacements of familiar and unknown faces on early and late-stage ERPs.
    Caharel S; Fiori N; Bernard C; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Oct; 62(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 16678927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accessing the meaning of invisible words.
    Yang YH; Yeh SL
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Jun; 20(2):223-33. PubMed ID: 20709576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The bilateral advantage for famous faces: interhemispheric communication or competition?
    Baird LM; Burton AM
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1581-7. PubMed ID: 18281066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiological correlates of facial decision: insights from upright and upside-down Mooney-face perception.
    George N; Jemel B; Fiori N; Chaby L; Renault B
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 15890502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semantic and subword priming during binocular suppression.
    Costello P; Jiang Y; Baartman B; McGlennen K; He S
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Jun; 18(2):375-82. PubMed ID: 19286396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 7-11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces: evidence against a developmental shift.
    Bonner L; Burton M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):1019-29. PubMed ID: 15370514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strength and coherence of binocular rivalry depends on shared stimulus complexity.
    Alais D; Melcher D
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(2):269-79. PubMed ID: 17049579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-level face shape adaptation depends on visual awareness: evidence from continuous flash suppression.
    Stein T; Sterzer P
    J Vis; 2011 Jul; 11(8):5. PubMed ID: 21742962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of emotional facial expressions on binocular rivalry.
    Bannerman RL; Milders M; De Gelder B; Sahraie A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jul; 28(4):317-26. PubMed ID: 18565087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A fresh look at interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.
    Lee SH; Blake R
    Vision Res; 2004 May; 44(10):983-91. PubMed ID: 15031091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Language experience shapes early electrophysiological responses to visual stimuli: the effects of writing system, stimulus length, and presentation duration.
    Xue G; Jiang T; Chen C; Dong Q
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):2025-37. PubMed ID: 18053744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Face processing at birth: a Thatcher illusion study.
    Leo I; Simion F
    Dev Sci; 2009 Apr; 12(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 19371374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conditions required for binocular rivalry suppression.
    Freeman AW; Li DF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):174-82. PubMed ID: 19304607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Representations of familiar and unfamiliar faces as revealed by viewpoint-aftereffects.
    Ryu JJ; Chaudhuri A
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(23):4059-63. PubMed ID: 16996559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The horizontal and vertical relations in upright faces are transmitted by different spatial frequency ranges.
    Goffaux V
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 18166166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advantage of hole stimulus in rivalry competition.
    Meng Q; Cui D; Zhou K; Chen L; Ma Y
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e33053. PubMed ID: 22457733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Face processing and familiarity: evidence from eye-movement data.
    Stacey PC; Walker S; Underwood JD
    Br J Psychol; 2005 Nov; 96(Pt 4):407-22. PubMed ID: 16248933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.