These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17470350)

  • 1. Sexual selection: does condition dependence fail to resolve the 'lek paradox'?
    Cotton S; Pomiankowski A
    Curr Biol; 2007 May; 17(9):R335-7. PubMed ID: 17470350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The depletion of genetic variance by sexual selection.
    Van Homrigh A; Higgie M; McGuigan K; Blows MW
    Curr Biol; 2007 Mar; 17(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 17306541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genic capture and the genetic basis of sexually selected traits in the zebra finch.
    Birkhead TR; Pellatt EJ; Matthews IM; Roddis NJ; Hunter FM; McPhie F; Castillo-Juarez H
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2389-98. PubMed ID: 17236429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Condition-dependent traits and the capture of genetic variance in male advertisement song.
    Brandt LS; Greenfield MD
    J Evol Biol; 2004 Jul; 17(4):821-8. PubMed ID: 15271081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox.
    Kotiaho JS; Simmons LW; Tomkins JL
    Nature; 2001 Apr; 410(6829):684-6. PubMed ID: 11287953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences.
    Cotton S; Small J; Pomiankowski A
    Curr Biol; 2006 Sep; 16(17):R755-65. PubMed ID: 16950102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stronger convex (stabilizing) selection on homologous sexual display traits in females than in males: a multipopulation comparison in Drosophila serrata.
    Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF
    Evolution; 2011 Mar; 65(3):893-9. PubMed ID: 21361917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Asymmetry of genetic variation in fitness-related traits: apparent stabilizing selection on g(max).
    McGuigan K; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2009 Nov; 63(11):2838-47. PubMed ID: 19545265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evolutionary limit to male mating success.
    McGuigan K; Van Homrigh A; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1528-37. PubMed ID: 18363864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Male sex drive and the maintenance of sex: evidence from Drosophila.
    Singh RS; Artieri CG
    J Hered; 2010; 101 Suppl 1():S100-6. PubMed ID: 20212005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual selection and immune function in Drosophila melanogaster.
    McKean KA; Nunney L
    Evolution; 2008 Feb; 62(2):386-400. PubMed ID: 18070086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sexual conflict and the maintenance of multivariate genetic variation.
    Hall MD; Lailvaux SP; Blows MW; Brooks RC
    Evolution; 2010 Jun; 64(6):1697-703. PubMed ID: 20050914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Condition dependence varies with mating success in male Drosophila bunnanda.
    McGuigan K
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Sep; 22(9):1813-25. PubMed ID: 19594666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sexual selection and condition-dependence.
    Johnstone RA; Rands SA; Evans MR
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Dec; 22(12):2387-94. PubMed ID: 19874439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic constraints and the evolution of display trait sexual dimorphism by natural and sexual selection.
    Chenoweth SF; Rundle HD; Blows MW
    Am Nat; 2008 Jan; 171(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 18171148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies.
    David P; Bjorksten T; Fowler K; Pomiankowski A
    Nature; 2000 Jul; 406(6792):186-8. PubMed ID: 10910358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The genetics of cuticular hydrocarbon profiles in the Fruit Fly Drosophila simulans.
    Sharma MD; Mitchell C; Hunt J; Tregenza T; Hosken DJ
    J Hered; 2012; 103(2):230-9. PubMed ID: 22268163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multivariate quantitative genetics and the lek paradox: genetic variance in male sexually selected traits of Drosophila serrata under field conditions.
    Hine E; Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2004 Dec; 58(12):2754-62. PubMed ID: 15696753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Condition dependence of a multicomponent sexual display trait in Drosophila serrata.
    Delcourt M; Rundle HD
    Am Nat; 2011 Jun; 177(6):812-23. PubMed ID: 21597257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microsatellite DNA analysis shows that greater sage grouse leks are not kin groups.
    Gibson RM; Pires D; Delaney KS; Wayne RK
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Dec; 14(14):4453-9. PubMed ID: 16313605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.