These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17470350)

  • 21. Evidence for sexual selection on structural plumage coloration in female eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis).
    Siefferman L; Hill GE
    Evolution; 2005 Aug; 59(8):1819-28. PubMed ID: 16331840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On the evolution of heightened condition dependence of male sexual displays.
    Gosden TP; Chenoweth SF
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Mar; 24(3):685-92. PubMed ID: 21214657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mating advantage of rare males in models of sexual selection.
    O'Donald P
    Nature; 1977 May; 267(5607):151-4. PubMed ID: 16073426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. On the resolution of the lek paradox.
    Kotiaho JS; LeBas NR; Puurtinen M; Tomkins JL
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2008 Jan; 23(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18077055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Natural selection and genetic variation for female resistance to harm from males.
    Linder JE; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2005 May; 18(3):568-75. PubMed ID: 15842486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sexual selection for size and symmetry in a diversifying secondary sexual character in Drosophila bipectinata Duda (Diptera: Drosophilidae).
    Polak M; Starmer WT; Wolf LL
    Evolution; 2004 Mar; 58(3):597-607. PubMed ID: 15119443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assortative mating in Drosophila adapted to a microsite ecological gradient.
    Singh SR; Rashkovetsky E; Iliadi K; Nevo E; Korol A
    Behav Genet; 2005 Nov; 35(6):753-64. PubMed ID: 16273320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Heightened condition dependence is not a general feature of male eyespan in stalk-eyed flies (Diptera: Diopsidae).
    Cotton S; Fowler K; Pomiankowski A
    J Evol Biol; 2004 Nov; 17(6):1310-6. PubMed ID: 15525415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The diversification of mate preferences by natural and sexual selection.
    Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Aug; 22(8):1608-15. PubMed ID: 19549142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Measuring natural and sexual selection on breeding values of male display traits in Drosophila serrata.
    Skroblin A; Blows MW
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Jan; 19(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 16405574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Operational sex ratio and density do not affect directional selection on male sexual ornaments and behavior.
    Head ML; Lindholm AK; Brooks R
    Evolution; 2008 Jan; 62(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 18067568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genetic analysis of female preference functions as function-valued traits.
    McGuigan K; Van Homrigh A; Blows MW
    Am Nat; 2008 Aug; 172(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 18597623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Female choice selects for a viability-based male trait in pheasants.
    von Schantz T; Göransson G; Andersson G; Fröberg I; Grahn M; Helgée A; Wittzell H
    Nature; 1989 Jan; 337(6203):166-9. PubMed ID: 2911350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Population genetic models of male and mutual mate choice.
    Servedio MR; Lande R
    Evolution; 2006 Apr; 60(4):674-85. PubMed ID: 16739450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Heritability of a sexually selected character expressed in both sexes.
    Wilcockson RW; Crean CS; Day TH
    Nature; 1995 Mar; 374(6518):158-9. PubMed ID: 7877687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis?
    Cotton S; Fowler K; Pomiankowski A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Apr; 271(1541):771-83. PubMed ID: 15255094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Experimental evidence that sexual conflict influences the opportunity, form and intensity of sexual selection.
    Hall MD; Bussière LF; Hunt J; Brooks R
    Evolution; 2008 Sep; 62(9):2305-15. PubMed ID: 18540949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intralocus sexual conflict.
    van Doorn GS
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jun; 1168():52-71. PubMed ID: 19566703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sexual conflict and the evolution of female preferences for indicators of male quality.
    van Doorn GS; Weissing FJ
    Am Nat; 2006 Dec; 168(6):742-57. PubMed ID: 17109317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The roles of natural and sexual selection during adaptation to a novel environment.
    Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2218-25. PubMed ID: 17236415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.