These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
662 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17471079)
1. Normal cervical spine range of motion in children 3-12 years old. Arbogast KB; Gholve PA; Friedman JE; Maltese MR; Tomasello MF; Dormans JP Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):E309-15. PubMed ID: 17471079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pediatric and adult three-dimensional cervical spine kinematics: effect of age and sex through overall motion. Greaves LL; Van Toen C; Melnyk A; Koenig L; Zhu Q; Tredwell S; Mulpuri K; Cripton PA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(16):1650-7. PubMed ID: 19770607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Active head and cervical range of motion: effect of age in healthy females. Tommasi DG; Foppiani AC; Galante D; Lovecchio N; Sforza C Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):1910-6. PubMed ID: 19680100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Establishing reference values for cervical spine range of motion in pre-pubescent children. Lynch-Caris T; Majeske KD; Brelin-Fornari J; Nashi S J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2714-9. PubMed ID: 18675420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Active range of motion of the head and cervical spine: a three-dimensional investigation in healthy young adults. Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Serrao G; Grassi G; Mossi E J Orthop Res; 2002 Jan; 20(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 11853078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Soft and rigid collars provide similar restriction in cervical range of motion during fifteen activities of daily living. Miller CP; Bible JE; Jegede KA; Whang PG; Grauer JN Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):1271-8. PubMed ID: 20512025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A 3D kinematic method for evaluating voluntary movements of the cervical spine in humans. Bulgheroni MV; Antonaci F; Ghirmai S; Sandrini G; Nappi G; Pedotti A Funct Neurol; 1998; 13(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 9800151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional analysis of the cervical spine kinematics: effect of age and gender in healthy subjects. Lansade C; Laporte S; Thoreux P; Rousseau MA; Skalli W; Lavaste F Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2900-6. PubMed ID: 20010397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement. Snyder JT; Tzermiadianos MN; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Rinella A; Dooris A; Carandang G; Renner SM; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2965-9. PubMed ID: 18091488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Normal functional range of motion of the lumbar spine during 15 activities of daily living. Bible JE; Biswas D; Miller CP; Whang PG; Grauer JN J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr; 23(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 20065869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Normative values for active lumbar range of motion in children. Kondratek M; Krauss J; Stiller C; Olson R Pediatr Phys Ther; 2007; 19(3):236-44. PubMed ID: 17700353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics. Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Natural variation of cervical range of motion: a one-way repeated-measures design. Christensen HW; Nilsson N J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998; 21(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 9726064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Normal functional range of motion of the cervical spine during 15 activities of daily living. Bible JE; Biswas D; Miller CP; Whang PG; Grauer JN J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Feb; 23(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 20051924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical spine range of motion in children with posterior occipitocervical arthrodesis. Wills BP; Jencikova-Celerin L; Dormans JP J Pediatr Orthop; 2006; 26(6):753-7. PubMed ID: 17065940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments. Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Renner SM; Rosler DM; Ochoa JA; Patwardhan AG Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis. Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical motion assessment using virtual reality. Sarig-Bahat H; Weiss PL; Laufer Y Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1018-24. PubMed ID: 19404177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]