662 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17471079)
1. Normal cervical spine range of motion in children 3-12 years old.
Arbogast KB; Gholve PA; Friedman JE; Maltese MR; Tomasello MF; Dormans JP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):E309-15. PubMed ID: 17471079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pediatric and adult three-dimensional cervical spine kinematics: effect of age and sex through overall motion.
Greaves LL; Van Toen C; Melnyk A; Koenig L; Zhu Q; Tredwell S; Mulpuri K; Cripton PA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(16):1650-7. PubMed ID: 19770607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Active head and cervical range of motion: effect of age in healthy females.
Tommasi DG; Foppiani AC; Galante D; Lovecchio N; Sforza C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):1910-6. PubMed ID: 19680100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Establishing reference values for cervical spine range of motion in pre-pubescent children.
Lynch-Caris T; Majeske KD; Brelin-Fornari J; Nashi S
J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2714-9. PubMed ID: 18675420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Active range of motion of the head and cervical spine: a three-dimensional investigation in healthy young adults.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Serrao G; Grassi G; Mossi E
J Orthop Res; 2002 Jan; 20(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 11853078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Soft and rigid collars provide similar restriction in cervical range of motion during fifteen activities of daily living.
Miller CP; Bible JE; Jegede KA; Whang PG; Grauer JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):1271-8. PubMed ID: 20512025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A 3D kinematic method for evaluating voluntary movements of the cervical spine in humans.
Bulgheroni MV; Antonaci F; Ghirmai S; Sandrini G; Nappi G; Pedotti A
Funct Neurol; 1998; 13(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 9800151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional analysis of the cervical spine kinematics: effect of age and gender in healthy subjects.
Lansade C; Laporte S; Thoreux P; Rousseau MA; Skalli W; Lavaste F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):2900-6. PubMed ID: 20010397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement.
Snyder JT; Tzermiadianos MN; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Rinella A; Dooris A; Carandang G; Renner SM; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2965-9. PubMed ID: 18091488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Normal functional range of motion of the lumbar spine during 15 activities of daily living.
Bible JE; Biswas D; Miller CP; Whang PG; Grauer JN
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr; 23(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 20065869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Normative values for active lumbar range of motion in children.
Kondratek M; Krauss J; Stiller C; Olson R
Pediatr Phys Ther; 2007; 19(3):236-44. PubMed ID: 17700353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Natural variation of cervical range of motion: a one-way repeated-measures design.
Christensen HW; Nilsson N
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1998; 21(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 9726064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Normal functional range of motion of the cervical spine during 15 activities of daily living.
Bible JE; Biswas D; Miller CP; Whang PG; Grauer JN
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Feb; 23(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 20051924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical spine range of motion in children with posterior occipitocervical arthrodesis.
Wills BP; Jencikova-Celerin L; Dormans JP
J Pediatr Orthop; 2006; 26(6):753-7. PubMed ID: 17065940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Renner SM; Rosler DM; Ochoa JA; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical motion assessment using virtual reality.
Sarig-Bahat H; Weiss PL; Laufer Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1018-24. PubMed ID: 19404177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantifying the lumbar flexion-relaxation phenomenon: theory, normative data, and clinical applications.
Neblett R; Mayer TG; Gatchel RJ; Keeley J; Proctor T; Anagnostis C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(13):1435-46. PubMed ID: 12838103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
