1641 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17471088)
1. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical study of pedicle screw fixation in severely osteoporotic bone.
Cook SD; Salkeld SL; Stanley T; Faciane A; Miller SD
Spine J; 2004; 4(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 15246300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel fenestrated pedicle screw augmented with bone cement in osteoporotic spines.
Paré PE; Chappuis JL; Rampersaud R; Agarwala AO; Perra JH; Erkan S; Wu C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug; 36(18):E1210-4. PubMed ID: 21325986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stability of pedicle screws after kyphoplasty augmentation: an experimental study to compare transpedicular screw fixation in soft and cured kyphoplasty cement.
Linhardt O; Lüring C; Matussek J; Hamberger C; Plitz W; Grifka J
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Apr; 19(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 16760780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pedicle screw design and cement augmentation in osteoporotic vertebrae: effects of fenestrations and cement viscosity on fixation and extraction.
Choma TJ; Pfeiffer FM; Swope RW; Hirner JP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Dec; 37(26):E1628-32. PubMed ID: 22996264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Choice of bone cement augmentation techniques when sacral pedicle screw loosening].
Yu B; Zhuang X; Li Z; Zheng Z
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 24(2):211-4. PubMed ID: 20187455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revision of the failed pedicle screw in osteoporotic lumbar spine: biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty versus transpedicular polymethylmethacrylate augmentation.
Derinçek A; Türker M; Cinar M; Cetik O; Kalaycioğlu B
Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2012; 23(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 22765490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pedicle screw augmentation with polyethylene tape: a biomechanical study in the osteoporotic thoracolumbar spine.
Hamasaki T; Tanaka N; Kim J; Okada M; Ochi M; Hutton WC
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr; 23(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 20051920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stability of anterior vertebral body screws after kyphoplasty augmentation. An experimental study to compare anterior vertebral body screw fixation in soft and cured kyphoplasty cement.
Linhardt O; Lüring C; Matussek J; Hamberger C; Herold T; Plitz W; Grifka J
Int Orthop; 2006 Oct; 30(5):366-70. PubMed ID: 16586135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical analysis of different techniques in revision spinal instrumentation: larger diameter screws versus cement augmentation.
Kiner DW; Wybo CD; Sterba W; Yeni YN; Bartol SW; Vaidya R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(24):2618-22. PubMed ID: 19011543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screws in osteoporotic bone with bioactive cement augmentation using simulated in vivo multicomponent loading.
Choma TJ; Frevert WF; Carson WL; Waters NP; Pfeiffer FM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Mar; 36(6):454-62. PubMed ID: 20881517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. PMMA-augmentation of incompletely cannulated pedicle screws: a cadaver study to determine the benefits in the osteoporotic spine.
Goost H; Deborre C; Wirtz DC; Burger C; Prescher A; Fölsch C; Pflugmacher R; Kabir K
Technol Health Care; 2014; 22(4):607-15. PubMed ID: 24837053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of cannulated pedicle screws for fixation in osteoporotic spines and comparison of its clinical results and biomechanical characteristics with the needle injection method.
Chang MC; Kao HC; Ying SH; Liu CL
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Aug; 26(6):305-15. PubMed ID: 23887077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cement augmentation of vertebral screws enhances the interface strength between interbody device and vertebral body.
Tan JS; Bailey CS; Dvorak MF; Fisher CG; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Feb; 32(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 17268265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw thread differential design in an osteoporotic cadaver model.
Mehta H; Santos E; Ledonio C; Sembrano J; Ellingson A; Pare P; Murrell B; Nuckley DJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Mar; 27(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 22071427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A titanium expandable pedicle screw improves initial pullout strength as compared with standard pedicle screws.
Vishnubhotla S; McGarry WB; Mahar AT; Gelb DE
Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):777-81. PubMed ID: 21802996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhancing pedicle screw fixation in the aging spine with a novel bioactive bone cement: an in vitro biomechanical study.
Zhu Q; Kingwell S; Li Z; Pan H; Lu WW; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(17):E1030-7. PubMed ID: 22531472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of pedicle screws increases the initial fixation in osteoporotic spine patients.
Sawakami K; Yamazaki A; Ishikawa S; Ito T; Watanabe K; Endo N
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Apr; 25(2):E28-35. PubMed ID: 22454185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
