148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17471252)
1. How many scientific papers should be retracted?
Cokol M; Iossifov I; Rodriguez-Esteban R; Rzhetsky A
EMBO Rep; 2007 May; 8(5):422-3. PubMed ID: 17471252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. STAP retracted.
Nature; 2014 Jul; 511(7507):5-6. PubMed ID: 24999504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
Steen RG
J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 21081306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preventing scientific fraud.
Noble DW
Ann Intern Med; 2006 Sep; 145(6):472; author reply 473-4. PubMed ID: 16983139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Retraction of Scientific Writing.
Pollock NW
Wilderness Environ Med; 2020 Sep; 31(3):257-258. PubMed ID: 32826165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Preventing scientific fraud.
Garfield E; McVeigh M; Muff M
Ann Intern Med; 2006 Sep; 145(6):472-3; author reply 473-4. PubMed ID: 16983138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Special notice to readers and authors on scientific misconduct.
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 56(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 19330396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientific record: Class uncorrected errors as misconduct.
Kamoun S; Zipfel C
Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7593):173. PubMed ID: 26961649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ensuring the integrity of the published record: Croatian Medical Journal endorses guidance on retractions in scientific journals by Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Marusic A; Damjanov I
Croat Med J; 2009 Dec; 50(6):531. PubMed ID: 20017219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Under suspicion.
Nature; 2010 Apr; 464(7293):1245. PubMed ID: 20428116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Retractions: trends, implications, and possible further steps.
Giglia E; Pescarmona GP
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2012 Jun; 48(2):339-43. PubMed ID: 22614895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Retraction policies of top scientific journals ranked by impact factor.
Resnik DB; Wager E; Kissling GE
J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jul; 103(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 26213505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shadow of doubt.
Shafer SL
Anesth Analg; 2011 Mar; 112(3):498-500. PubMed ID: 21296856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2011 Oct; 478(7367):26-8. PubMed ID: 21979026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles".
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Wager E; Barbour V; Yentis S; Kleinert S;
Obes Rev; 2010 Jan; 11(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 20653849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Correcting the Medical Literature: "To Err Is Human, to Correct Divine".
Christiansen L; Flanagin A
JAMA; 2017 Sep; 318(9):804-805. PubMed ID: 28873144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Upholding the highest standards of integrity in the content of the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.
Seiber JN
J Agric Food Chem; 2012 Mar; 60(10):2403. PubMed ID: 22414428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A retrospective of retractions: the striking record in 2011.
Nat Med; 2011 Dec; 17(12):1544. PubMed ID: 22146450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Preventing scientific fraud.
Garrel DR; Rabasa-Lhoret R; Boyle P
Ann Intern Med; 2006 Sep; 145(6):473; author reply 473-4. PubMed ID: 16983141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
