These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17471725)

  • 1. Near equivalence of human click-evoked and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.
    Kalluri R; Shera CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2097-110. PubMed ID: 17471725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reflection-Source Emissions Evoked with Clicks and Frequency Sweeps: Comparisons Across Levels.
    Charaziak KK; Shera CA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Dec; 22(6):641-658. PubMed ID: 34606020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.
    Shera CA; Guinan JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Feb; 105(2 Pt 1):782-98. PubMed ID: 9972564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The origin of SFOAE microstructure in the guinea pig.
    Goodman SS; Withnell RH; Shera CA
    Hear Res; 2003 Sep; 183(1-2):7-17. PubMed ID: 13679133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions evoked by swept tones.
    Chen S; Deng J; Bian L; Li G
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():104-14. PubMed ID: 24113114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time-frequency analyses of transient-evoked stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: testing cochlear model predictions.
    Konrad-Martin D; Keefe DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2021-43. PubMed ID: 14587602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tone burst evoked otoacoustic emissions in different age-groups of schoolchildren.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Olszewski L; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 79(8):1310-5. PubMed ID: 26092548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured by compression, suppression, and spectral smoothing.
    Kalluri R; Shera CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3562-75. PubMed ID: 18247764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic stimulation of human medial olivocochlear efferents reduces stimulus-frequency and click-evoked otoacoustic emission delays: Implications for cochlear filter bandwidths.
    Francis NA; Guinan JJ
    Hear Res; 2010 Aug; 267(1-2):36-45. PubMed ID: 20430088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192930. PubMed ID: 29451905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs.
    Guinan JJ; Backus BC; Lilaonitkul W; Aharonson V
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2003 Dec; 4(4):521-40. PubMed ID: 12799992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of click intensity on click-evoked otoacoustic emission waveforms: implications for the origin of emissions.
    Carvalho S; Büki B; Bonfils P; Avan P
    Hear Res; 2003 Jan; 175(1-2):215-25. PubMed ID: 12527140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reflection- and Distortion-Source Otoacoustic Emissions: Evidence for Increased Irregularity in the Human Cochlea During Aging.
    Abdala C; Ortmann AJ; Shera CA
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Oct; 19(5):493-510. PubMed ID: 29968098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term stability between click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs: A comparison.
    Hoshino M; Ueda H; Nakata S
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1999; 61(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 10450050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrically Evoked Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Effects on Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Guinea Pigs.
    Berezina-Greene MA; Guinan JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 18(1):153-163. PubMed ID: 27798720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonlinear temporal interactions in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. II. Experimental data.
    Kapadia S; Lutman ME
    Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 146(1-2):101-20. PubMed ID: 10913888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonlinear temporal interactions in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. I. Assumed model and polarity-symmetry.
    Kapadia S; Lutman ME
    Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 146(1-2):89-100. PubMed ID: 10913887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of intermodulation distortion in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Yates GK; Withnell RH
    Hear Res; 1999 Oct; 136(1-2):49-64. PubMed ID: 10511624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time-frequency decomposition of click evoked otoacoustic emissions in children.
    Mishra SK; Biswal M
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():161-178. PubMed ID: 26976693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noise-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Maat B; Wit HP; van Dijk P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Nov; 108(5 Pt 1):2272-80. PubMed ID: 11108368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.