BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17471737)

  • 1. Effects of carrier pulse rate and stimulation site on modulation detection by subjects with cochlear implants.
    Pfingst BE; Xu L; Thompson CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2236-46. PubMed ID: 17471737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Across-site patterns of modulation detection: relation to speech recognition.
    Garadat SN; Zwolan TA; Pfingst BE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4030-41. PubMed ID: 22559376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users.
    Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 22367093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved electrically evoked auditory steady-state response thresholds in humans.
    Hofmann M; Wouters J
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Aug; 13(4):573-89. PubMed ID: 22569837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of phase duration on detection of electrical stimulation of the human cochlea.
    Moon AK; Zwolan TA; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 1993 May; 67(1-2):166-78. PubMed ID: 8340268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pulse-rate discrimination deficit in cochlear implant users: is the upper limit of pitch peripheral or central?
    Zhou N; Mathews J; Dong L
    Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():1-10. PubMed ID: 30423498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory cortex phase locking to amplitude-modulated cochlear implant pulse trains.
    Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):76-91. PubMed ID: 18367697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory detection and discrimination in deaf cats: psychophysical and neural thresholds for intracochlear electrical signals.
    Vollmer M; Beitel RE; Snyder RL
    J Neurophysiol; 2001 Nov; 86(5):2330-43. PubMed ID: 11698523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear-implant high pulse rate and narrow electrode configuration impair transmission of temporal information to the auditory cortex.
    Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):92-107. PubMed ID: 18450583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
    Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of site-specific level adjustments on speech recognition with cochlear implants.
    Zhou N; Pfingst BE
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 24225651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monopolar Detection Thresholds Predict Spatial Selectivity of Neural Excitation in Cochlear Implants: Implications for Speech Recognition.
    Zhou N
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0165476. PubMed ID: 27798658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Across-site patterns of modulation detection in listeners with cochlear implants.
    Pfingst BE; Burkholder-Juhasz RA; Xu L; Thompson CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1054-62. PubMed ID: 18247907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.
    Carlyon RP; van Wieringen A; Deeks JM; Long CJ; Lyzenga J; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):210-24. PubMed ID: 15953530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory temporal acuity probed with cochlear implant stimulation and cortical recording.
    Kirby AE; Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jan; 103(1):531-42. PubMed ID: 19923242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal response properties of the auditory nerve: data from human cochlear-implant recipients.
    Hughes ML; Castioni EE; Goehring JL; Baudhuin JL
    Hear Res; 2012 Mar; 285(1-2):46-57. PubMed ID: 22326590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Encoding of the amplitude modulation of pulsatile electrical stimulation in the feline cochlear nucleus by neurons in the inferior colliculus; effects of stimulus pulse rate.
    McCreery D; Han M; Pikov V; Yadav K; Pannu S
    J Neural Eng; 2013 Oct; 10(5):056010. PubMed ID: 23928683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal Modulation Detection Depends on Sharpness of Spatial Tuning.
    Zhou N; Cadmus M; Dong L; Mathews J
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Jun; 19(3):317-330. PubMed ID: 29696448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.