These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17471744)

  • 21. Sources of variability in consonant perception of normal-hearing listeners.
    Zaar J; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1253-67. PubMed ID: 26428764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Consonant Perception in Connected Syllables Spoken at a Conversational Syllabic Rate.
    Phatak SA; Zion DJ; Grant KW
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231156673. PubMed ID: 36794551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech sound discrimination by Mongolian gerbils.
    Jüchter C; Beutelmann R; Klump GM
    Hear Res; 2022 May; 418():108472. PubMed ID: 35276418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration.
    Grant KW; Walden BE; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2677-90. PubMed ID: 9604361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perception of the [m]-[n] distinction in consonant-vowel (CV) and vowel-consonant (VC) syllables produced by child and adult talkers.
    Ohde RN; Haley KL; Barnes CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1697-711. PubMed ID: 16583913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of Expanding Envelope Fluctuations on Consonant Perception in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Wiinberg A; Zaar J; Dau T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518775293. PubMed ID: 29756553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y; Nelson PB; Wang B; Zou H
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise.
    Füllgrabe C; Berthommier F; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2006 Jan; 211(1-2):74-84. PubMed ID: 16289579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of Different Hearing Aid Prescriptions for Children.
    Marriage JE; Vickers DA; Baer T; Glasberg BR; Moore BCJ
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 28691934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of perceptual confusions between nine sets of consonant-vowel sounds in normal and dyslexic adults.
    Cornelissen PL; Hansen PC; Bradley L; Stein JF
    Cognition; 1996 Jun; 59(3):275-306. PubMed ID: 8706379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Closed-set effects in consonant confusion patterns.
    Bell TS; Dirks DD; Kincaid GE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):944-8. PubMed ID: 2601323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analysis of English nonsense syllable recognition in noise.
    Benkí JR
    Phonetica; 2003; 60(2):129-57. PubMed ID: 12853716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of noise on vowel and consonant cues.
    Parikh G; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Dec; 118(6):3874-88. PubMed ID: 16419830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Across- and within-consonant errors for isolated syllables in noise.
    Toscano JC; Allen JB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Dec; 57(6):2293-307. PubMed ID: 25087617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On the role of the amplitude of the fricative noise in the perception of place of articulation in voiceless fricative consonants.
    Behrens S; Blumstein SE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Sep; 84(3):861-7. PubMed ID: 3183204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Consonant recognition in quiet and in noise with aging among normal hearing listeners.
    Gelfand SA; Piper N; Silman S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Dec; 80(6):1589-98. PubMed ID: 3794064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.
    Fu QJ; Shannon RV; Wang X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec; 104(6):3586-96. PubMed ID: 9857517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.