These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17471744)

  • 41. Voiced initial consonant perception deficits in older listeners with hearing loss and good and poor word recognition.
    Phillips SL; Richter SJ; McPherson D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 52(1):118-29. PubMed ID: 18664682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations: Effects of carrier type, interfering noise, and subject experience.
    Whitmal NA; Poissant SF; Freyman RL; Helfer KS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2376-88. PubMed ID: 17902872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of masker type on native and non-native consonant perception in noise.
    Garcia Lecumberri ML; Cooke M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2445-54. PubMed ID: 16642857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Perceptual invariance and onset spectra for stop consonants in different vowel environments.
    Blumstein SE; Stevens KN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Feb; 67(2):648-62. PubMed ID: 7358906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Predicting consonant recognition and confusions in normal-hearing listeners.
    Zaar J; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):1051. PubMed ID: 28253684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Acoustic and electrical pattern analysis of consonant perceptual cues used by cochlear implant users.
    Teoh SW; Neuburger HS; Svirsky MA
    Audiol Neurootol; 2003; 8(5):269-85. PubMed ID: 12904682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Quantitative evaluation of lexical status, word frequency, and neighborhood density as context effects in spoken word recognition.
    Benki JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1689-705. PubMed ID: 12656401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Masked thresholds and consonant recognition in low-pass maskers for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2430-41. PubMed ID: 7714260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Phoneme recognition in modulated maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1646-54. PubMed ID: 22978893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
    Hedrick MS; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Age differences for stop-consonant and vowel perception in adults.
    Ohde RN; Abou-Khalil R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2156-66. PubMed ID: 11681392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The effects of increasing consonant/vowel intensity ratio on speech loudness.
    Montgomery AA; Prosek RA; Walden BE; Cord MT
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):221-8. PubMed ID: 3430381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition.
    Van Tasell DJ; Soli SD; Kirby VM; Widin GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Oct; 82(4):1152-61. PubMed ID: 3680774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Responses of "high-spontaneous" auditory-nerve fibers to consonant-vowel syllables in noise.
    Geisler CD; Gamble T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1639-52. PubMed ID: 2708680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. On cross-language consonant identification in second language noise.
    Marchegiani L; Fafoutis X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Oct; 138(4):2206-9. PubMed ID: 26520302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The phonetic landscape in infant consonant perception is an uneven terrain.
    Nam Y; Polka L
    Cognition; 2016 Oct; 155():57-66. PubMed ID: 27352133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Categorical dependence of vowel detection in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Eddins DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4539-46. PubMed ID: 18537402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Consonant-feature transmission as a function of presentation level in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Gutnick HN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Oct; 72(4):1124-30. PubMed ID: 7142577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Duration of frication noise required for identification of English fricatives.
    Jongman A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1718-25. PubMed ID: 2708688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.