These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17472098)

  • 1. Distortions in the memory of the pitch of speech.
    Stern SE; Mullennix JW; Corneille O; Huart J
    Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(2):148-60. PubMed ID: 17472098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.
    Bishop J; Keating P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1100-12. PubMed ID: 22894229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of vocal variation on listener recall.
    Rockwell P
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1996 May; 25(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 8648593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of speech rate as a function of vocal intensity and frequency.
    Feldstein S; Bond RN
    Lang Speech; 1981 Dec; 24(Pt 4):387-94. PubMed ID: 7343789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pitch discrimination and pitch matching abilities with vocal and nonvocal stimuli.
    Moore RE; Estis J; Gordon-Hickey S; Watts C
    J Voice; 2008 Jul; 22(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 17509827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of analogy instruction for pitch variation on perceptual ratings of other speech parameters.
    Tse AC; Wong AW; Ma EP; Whitehill TL; Masters RS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):906-12. PubMed ID: 23811473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of musical background on judgments of dysphonia.
    Eadie TL; Van Boven L; Stubbs K; Giannini E
    J Voice; 2010 Jan; 24(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 19038531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A modulatory effect of male voice pitch on long-term memory in women: evidence of adaptation for mate choice?
    Smith DS; Jones BC; Feinberg DR; Allan K
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Jan; 40(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 21901577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing linguistic information enhances singing proficiency in occasional singers.
    Berkowska M; Dalla Bella S
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jul; 1169():108-11. PubMed ID: 19673763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of creaky voice in Cantonese tonal perception.
    Yu KM; Lam HW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1320. PubMed ID: 25190405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual judgment of voice pitch during pitch-matching tasks.
    Schueller M; Fucci D; Bond ZS
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Jun; 94(3 Pt 1):967-74. PubMed ID: 12081301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of tonal movement and vowel quality on intelligibility in singing.
    Andreas T
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16517520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sex-related differences in vocal responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalization.
    Chen Z; Liu P; Jones JA; Huang D; Liu H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):EL355-60. PubMed ID: 21218857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of two algorithms for detecting human frequency-following responses to voice pitch.
    Jeng FC; Hu J; Dickman B; Lin CY; Lin CD; Wang CY; Chung HK; Li X
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 21047294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Native language affects rhythmic grouping of speech.
    Bhatara A; Boll-Avetisyan N; Unger A; Nazzi T; Höhle B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3828-43. PubMed ID: 24180792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Voice recognition: effects of orienting task, and a test of blind versus sighted listeners.
    Winograd E; Kerr NH; Spence MJ
    Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 6721008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-linguistic comparison of frequency-following responses to voice pitch in American and Chinese neonates and adults.
    Jeng FC; Hu J; Dickman B; Montgomery-Reagan K; Tong M; Wu G; Lin CD
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):699-707. PubMed ID: 21543983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Return to Oz: voice pitch facilitates assessments of men's body size.
    Pisanski K; Fraccaro PJ; Tigue CC; O'Connor JJ; Feinberg DR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1316-31. PubMed ID: 24933617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perception of pitch height in lexical and musical tones by English-speaking musicians and nonmusicians.
    Lee CY; Lekich A; Zhang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1607-15. PubMed ID: 24606295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.