These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1747269)

  • 1. How well do family practitioner committee and general practice records agree? Experience in a semi-rural practice.
    Voss SN; Thomas HF
    Br J Gen Pract; 1991 Jul; 41(348):293-4. PubMed ID: 1747269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computerized family practitioner committee records--a data base for general practitioners.
    Hargrave L; Hutchinson A; Cavill A; Goldstone LA; Watson H
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1988 Jan; 38(306):22-3. PubMed ID: 3204546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can patients with osteoporosis, who should benefit from implementation of the national service framework for older people, be identified from general practice computer records? A pilot study that illustrates the variability of computerized medical records and problems with searching them.
    de Lusignan S; Chan T; Wells S; Cooper A; Harvey M; Brew S; Wright M
    Public Health; 2003 Nov; 117(6):438-45. PubMed ID: 14522160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Family practitioner committee records--a neglected resource. 3. Three inner city areas compared.
    Harris CM; Hanson F
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1986 May; 36(286):217-9. PubMed ID: 3746766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electronic medical summaries in general practice--considering the patient's contribution.
    Ward L; Innes M
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Apr; 53(489):293-7. PubMed ID: 12879829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Completeness and accuracy of morbidity and repeat prescribing records held on general practice computers in Scotland.
    Whitelaw FG; Nevin SL; Milne RM; Taylor RJ; Taylor MW; Watt AH
    Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Mar; 46(404):181-6. PubMed ID: 8731627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How well are parent held records kept and completed?
    Saffin K; Macfarlane A
    Br J Gen Pract; 1991 Jun; 41(347):249-51. PubMed ID: 1931204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of counsellors in general practice. A qualitative study.
    Sibbald B; Addington-Hall J; Brenneman D; Obe PF
    Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract; 1996 Nov; (74):1-19. PubMed ID: 9080766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The quality of record keeping in primary care: a comparison of computerised, paper and hybrid systems.
    Hamilton WT; Round AP; Sharp D; Peters TJ
    Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Dec; 53(497):929-33; discussion 933. PubMed ID: 14960216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in general practice organization: survey of general practitioners' views on the 1990 contract and fundholding.
    Leese B; Bosanquet N
    Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Feb; 46(403):95-9. PubMed ID: 8855016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Family practitioner committee records--a neglected resource. 1. An information service for general practitioners based on claims for fees.
    Harris CM; Hanson F
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1986 Mar; 36(284):111-3. PubMed ID: 3712346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What is the quality of general practitioner records in Australia?
    Del Mar C; Lowe JB; Adkins P; Arnold E
    Aust Fam Physician; 1996 Jan; Suppl 1():S21-5. PubMed ID: 9479794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computers in general practice: the patient's voice.
    Potter AR
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1981 Nov; 31(232):683-5. PubMed ID: 7328555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How bad are medical records? A review of the notes received by a practice.
    Mansfield BG
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1986 Sep; 36(290):405-6. PubMed ID: 3806485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Missed opportunities: intimate partner violence in family practice settings.
    Coker AL; Bethea L; Smith PH; Fadden MK; Brandt HM
    Prev Med; 2002 Apr; 34(4):445-54. PubMed ID: 11914051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of routinely collected clinical data on acute medical admissions to one hospital.
    Hobbs FD; Parle JV; Kenkre JE
    Br J Gen Pract; 1997 Jul; 47(420):439-40. PubMed ID: 9281872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Should patients in general practice be offered a copy of their medical record?].
    Thorsen O; Grimsmo A
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Feb; 126(5):603-4. PubMed ID: 16505870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of general practitioner referrals to outpatient departments: assessment by specialists and a general practitioner.
    Jenkins RM
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Mar; 43(368):111-3. PubMed ID: 8323788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality and variability of osteoporosis data in general practice computer records: implications for disease registers.
    de Lusignan S; Chan T; Wood O; Hague N; Valentin T; Van Vlymen J
    Public Health; 2005 Sep; 119(9):771-80. PubMed ID: 15893348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Audit of a system for dealing with a practice's laboratory test results.
    Stephenson P
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Sep; 43(374):383-5. PubMed ID: 8251236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.