These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17473327)

  • 1. Interaural pitch perception difference: dependence upon internal and external factors.
    Mürbe D; Kevanishvili Z; Kuhlisch E; Hofmann G; Zahnert T
    Georgian Med News; 2007 Mar; (144):18-24. PubMed ID: 17473327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency and intensity effects on ear dominance for tone bursts.
    Leek MR; Brandt JF
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 7187913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The neural networks involved in pitch labeling of absolute pitch musicians.
    Wu C; Kirk IJ; Hamm JP; Lim VK
    Neuroreport; 2008 May; 19(8):851-4. PubMed ID: 18463500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lateralization of high-frequency pure tones with interaural phase difference and bone conduction.
    Rowan D; Gray M
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jul; 47(7):404-11. PubMed ID: 18574778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Behavior of evoked otoacoustic emission under low-frequency tone exposure: Objective study of the bounce phenomenon in humans.
    Kevanishvili Z; Hofmann G; Burdzgla I; Pietsch M; Gamgebeli Z; Yarin Y; Tushishvili M; Zahnert T
    Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 222(1-2):62-9. PubMed ID: 17052872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL; Abouchacra KS; Zeki Al Hazzouri AG; Zaytoun G
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binaural hearing, atresia, and the masking dilemma.
    Lenhardt ML; Goldstein BA; Shulman A
    Int Tinnitus J; 2006; 12(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 17260874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eyes as fenestrations to the ears: a novel mechanism for high-frequency and ultrasonic hearing.
    Lenhardt ML
    Int Tinnitus J; 2007; 13(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 17691656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test-retest reliability of the acoustic stapedial reflex test in healthy neonates.
    Mazlan R; Kei J; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 19322092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of lateralized adaptors on lateral position judgements of tones within and across frequency channels.
    Vigneault-MacLean BK; Hall SE; Phillips DP
    Hear Res; 2007 Feb; 224(1-2):93-100. PubMed ID: 17223297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing loss and middle ear involvement in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
    Ikiz AO; Unsal E; Kirkim G; Erdag TK; Guneri EA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1079-85. PubMed ID: 17482280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Referential coding contributes to the horizontal SMARC effect.
    Cho YS; Bae GY; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):726-34. PubMed ID: 22141586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between pitch discrimination and vocal production: comparison of vocal and instrumental musicians.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jan; 125(1):328-38. PubMed ID: 19173420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
    Arnoldner C; Riss D; Kaider A; Mair A; Wagenblast J; Baumgartner WD; Gstöttner W; Hamzavi JS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interhemispheric support during demanding auditory signal-in-noise processing.
    Stracke H; Okamoto H; Pantev C
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jun; 19(6):1440-7. PubMed ID: 18936273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Processing of pitch and time sequences in music.
    Neuhaus C; Knösche TR
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Aug; 441(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 18584960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of stimulus intensity on the right ear advantage in dichotic listening.
    Hugdahl K; Westerhausen R; Alho K; Medvedev S; Hämäläinen H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jan; 431(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 18162310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of Mandarin tones by English-speaking musicians and nonmusicians.
    Lee CY; Hung TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3235-48. PubMed ID: 19045807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.