152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17473350)
1. Accounting for range uncertainties in the optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy.
Unkelbach J; Chan TC; Bortfeld T
Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(10):2755-73. PubMed ID: 17473350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Worst case optimization: a method to account for uncertainties in the optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy.
Pflugfelder D; Wilkens JJ; Oelfke U
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(6):1689-700. PubMed ID: 18367797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uncertainty reduction in intensity modulated proton therapy by inverse Monte Carlo treatment planning.
Morávek Z; Rickhey M; Hartmann M; Bogner L
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4803-19. PubMed ID: 19622848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A robust algorithm of intensity modulated proton therapy for critical tissue sparing and target coverage.
Inaniwa T; Kanematsu N; Furukawa T; Hasegawa A
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(15):4749-70. PubMed ID: 21753233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between the lateral penumbra of a collimated double-scattered beam and uncollimated scanning beam in proton radiotherapy.
Safai S; Bortfeld T; Engelsman M
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(6):1729-50. PubMed ID: 18367800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric advantages of IMPT over IMRT for laser-accelerated proton beams.
Luo W; Li J; Fourkal E; Fan J; Xu X; Chen Z; Jin L; Price R; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7151-66. PubMed ID: 19033641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of the optimization starting conditions on the robustness of intensity-modulated proton therapy plans.
Albertini F; Hug EB; Lomax AJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 May; 55(10):2863-78. PubMed ID: 20427853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity of intensity modulated proton therapy plans to changes in patient weight.
Albertini F; Bolsi A; Lomax AJ; Rutz HP; Timmerman B; Goitein G
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Feb; 86(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 18199516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental verification of IMPT treatment plans in an anthropomorphic phantom in the presence of delivery uncertainties.
Albertini F; Casiraghi M; Lorentini S; Rombi B; Lomax AJ
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4415-31. PubMed ID: 21709345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intensity modulated proton therapy and its sensitivity to treatment uncertainties 1: the potential effects of calculational uncertainties.
Lomax AJ
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(4):1027-42. PubMed ID: 18263956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of dose engine accuracy on the optimum dose distribution in intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment plans.
Soukup M; Alber M
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):725-40. PubMed ID: 17228117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reducing the sensitivity of IMPT treatment plans to setup errors and range uncertainties via probabilistic treatment planning.
Unkelbach J; Bortfeld T; Martin BC; Soukup M
Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):149-63. PubMed ID: 19235384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel patch-field design using an optimized grid filter for passively scattered proton beams.
Li Y; Zhang X; Dong L; Mohan R
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(12):N265-75. PubMed ID: 17664545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimax optimization for handling range and setup uncertainties in proton therapy.
Fredriksson A; Forsgren A; Hårdemark B
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1672-84. PubMed ID: 21520880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intensity modulated proton therapy and its sensitivity to treatment uncertainties 2: the potential effects of inter-fraction and inter-field motions.
Lomax AJ
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(4):1043-56. PubMed ID: 18263957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment-planning study of prostate cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy with a Varian Clinac operated without a flattening filter.
Vassiliev ON; Kry SF; Kuban DA; Salehpour M; Mohan R; Titt U
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Aug; 68(5):1567-71. PubMed ID: 17544596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of optimization strategies and the effect of initial conditions on IMAT optimization using a leaf position optimization algorithm.
Oliver M; Jensen M; Chen J; Wong E
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(11):3543-61. PubMed ID: 19454783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can protons improve SBRT for lung lesions? Dosimetric considerations.
Georg D; Hillbrand M; Stock M; Dieckmann K; Pötter R
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Sep; 88(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 18405986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relating two techniques for handling uncertainties in IMRT optimization.
Unkelbach J; Oelfke U
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):N423-7. PubMed ID: 17110760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic splitting of Gaussian pencil beams in heterogeneity-correction algorithms for radiotherapy with heavy charged particles.
Kanematsu N; Komori M; Yonai S; Ishizaki A
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):2015-27. PubMed ID: 19287085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
