These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17473352)
1. Error analysis of tumor blood flow measurement using dynamic contrast-enhanced data and model-independent deconvolution analysis. Murase K; Miyazaki S Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(10):2791-805. PubMed ID: 17473352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deconvolution analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced data based on singular value decomposition optimized by generalized cross validation. Murase K; Yamazaki Y; Miyazaki S Magn Reson Med Sci; 2004; 3(4):165-75. PubMed ID: 16093635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Aspects on the accuracy of cerebral perfusion parameters obtained by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: a simulation study. Knutsson L; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jul; 22(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 15234447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of hepatic extraction fraction and input relative blood flow using dynamic hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced MRI. Nilsson H; Nordell A; Vargas R; Douglas L; Jonas E; Blomqvist L J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jun; 29(6):1323-31. PubMed ID: 19472389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correcting saturation effects of the arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI: a Monte Carlo simulation. Brunecker P; Villringer A; Schultze J; Nolte CH; Jungehülsing GJ; Endres M; Steinbrink J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 25(9):1300-11. PubMed ID: 17462846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Precision, signal-to-noise ratio, and dose optimization of magnitude and phase arterial input functions in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Kotys MS; Akbudak E; Markham J; Conturo TE J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):598-611. PubMed ID: 17326084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study. Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tracer kinetics analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR data in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: comparison of the results. Bisdas S; Baghi M; Wagenblast J; Bisdas T; Thng CH; Mack MG; Koh TS; Ernemann U Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2009 Sep; 29(5):339-46. PubMed ID: 19473200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification of perfusion and permeability in breast tumors with a deconvolution-based analysis of second-bolus T1-DCE data. Makkat S; Luypaert R; Sourbron S; Stadnik T; De Mey J J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jun; 25(6):1159-67. PubMed ID: 17520720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gadolinium-enhanced echo-planar T2-weighted MRI of tumors in the extracranial head and neck: feasibility study and preliminary results using a distributed-parameter tracer kinetic analysis. Bisdas S; Baghi M; Wagenblast J; Vogl TJ; Thng CH; Koh TS J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 May; 27(5):963-9. PubMed ID: 18407543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scan-rescan variability in perfusion assessment of tumors in MRI using both model and data-derived arterial input functions. Ashton E; Raunig D; Ng C; Kelcz F; McShane T; Evelhoch J J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):791-6. PubMed ID: 18777526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Cheng HL J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):736-43. PubMed ID: 18777534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of contrast agent concentration in intra- and extra-vascular spaces of brain tissue. Yahaghi E; Soltanian-Zadeh H; Shahriari M; Fatouraee N; Ewing JR Math Biosci; 2006 Nov; 204(1):102-18. PubMed ID: 16978665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of tumor blood flow using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and deconvolution analysis: a preliminary study in musculoskeletal tumors. Sugawara Y; Murase K; Kikuchi K; Sakayama K; Miyazaki T; Kajihara M; Miki H; Mochizuki T J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2006; 30(6):983-90. PubMed ID: 17082707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reexamining the quantification of perfusion MRI data in the presence of bolus dispersion. Ko L; Salluzzi M; Frayne R; Smith M J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):639-43. PubMed ID: 17326085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Error estimation for perfusion parameters obtained using the two-compartment exchange model in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a simulation study. Luypaert R; Sourbron S; Makkat S; de Mey J Phys Med Biol; 2010 Nov; 55(21):6431-43. PubMed ID: 20952813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deconvolution of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data by linear inversion: choice of the regularization parameter. Sourbron S; Luypaert R; Van Schuerbeek P; Dujardin M; Stadnik T; Osteaux M Magn Reson Med; 2004 Jul; 52(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 15236389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved bolus arrival time and arterial input function estimation for tracer kinetic analysis in DCE-MRI. Singh A; Rathore RK; Haris M; Verma SK; Husain N; Gupta RK J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 29(1):166-76. PubMed ID: 19097111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model applied to quantification of cerebral blood flow using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Murase K; Yamazaki Y; Shinohara M Magn Reson Med Sci; 2003 Jul; 2(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 16210825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal location for arterial input function measurements near the middle cerebral artery in first-pass perfusion MRI. Bleeker EJ; van Buchem MA; van Osch MJ J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2009 Apr; 29(4):840-52. PubMed ID: 19142193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]