109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17473352)
1. Error analysis of tumor blood flow measurement using dynamic contrast-enhanced data and model-independent deconvolution analysis.
Murase K; Miyazaki S
Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(10):2791-805. PubMed ID: 17473352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deconvolution analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced data based on singular value decomposition optimized by generalized cross validation.
Murase K; Yamazaki Y; Miyazaki S
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2004; 3(4):165-75. PubMed ID: 16093635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Aspects on the accuracy of cerebral perfusion parameters obtained by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: a simulation study.
Knutsson L; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Jul; 22(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 15234447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of hepatic extraction fraction and input relative blood flow using dynamic hepatocyte-specific contrast-enhanced MRI.
Nilsson H; Nordell A; Vargas R; Douglas L; Jonas E; Blomqvist L
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jun; 29(6):1323-31. PubMed ID: 19472389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correcting saturation effects of the arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI: a Monte Carlo simulation.
Brunecker P; Villringer A; Schultze J; Nolte CH; Jungehülsing GJ; Endres M; Steinbrink J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 25(9):1300-11. PubMed ID: 17462846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Precision, signal-to-noise ratio, and dose optimization of magnitude and phase arterial input functions in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Kotys MS; Akbudak E; Markham J; Conturo TE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):598-611. PubMed ID: 17326084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tracer kinetics analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR data in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: comparison of the results.
Bisdas S; Baghi M; Wagenblast J; Bisdas T; Thng CH; Mack MG; Koh TS; Ernemann U
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2009 Sep; 29(5):339-46. PubMed ID: 19473200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantification of perfusion and permeability in breast tumors with a deconvolution-based analysis of second-bolus T1-DCE data.
Makkat S; Luypaert R; Sourbron S; Stadnik T; De Mey J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jun; 25(6):1159-67. PubMed ID: 17520720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gadolinium-enhanced echo-planar T2-weighted MRI of tumors in the extracranial head and neck: feasibility study and preliminary results using a distributed-parameter tracer kinetic analysis.
Bisdas S; Baghi M; Wagenblast J; Vogl TJ; Thng CH; Koh TS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 May; 27(5):963-9. PubMed ID: 18407543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scan-rescan variability in perfusion assessment of tumors in MRI using both model and data-derived arterial input functions.
Ashton E; Raunig D; Ng C; Kelcz F; McShane T; Evelhoch J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):791-6. PubMed ID: 18777526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Cheng HL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):736-43. PubMed ID: 18777534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of contrast agent concentration in intra- and extra-vascular spaces of brain tissue.
Yahaghi E; Soltanian-Zadeh H; Shahriari M; Fatouraee N; Ewing JR
Math Biosci; 2006 Nov; 204(1):102-18. PubMed ID: 16978665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of tumor blood flow using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and deconvolution analysis: a preliminary study in musculoskeletal tumors.
Sugawara Y; Murase K; Kikuchi K; Sakayama K; Miyazaki T; Kajihara M; Miki H; Mochizuki T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2006; 30(6):983-90. PubMed ID: 17082707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reexamining the quantification of perfusion MRI data in the presence of bolus dispersion.
Ko L; Salluzzi M; Frayne R; Smith M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):639-43. PubMed ID: 17326085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Error estimation for perfusion parameters obtained using the two-compartment exchange model in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a simulation study.
Luypaert R; Sourbron S; Makkat S; de Mey J
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Nov; 55(21):6431-43. PubMed ID: 20952813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deconvolution of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data by linear inversion: choice of the regularization parameter.
Sourbron S; Luypaert R; Van Schuerbeek P; Dujardin M; Stadnik T; Osteaux M
Magn Reson Med; 2004 Jul; 52(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 15236389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved bolus arrival time and arterial input function estimation for tracer kinetic analysis in DCE-MRI.
Singh A; Rathore RK; Haris M; Verma SK; Husain N; Gupta RK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 29(1):166-76. PubMed ID: 19097111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model applied to quantification of cerebral blood flow using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Murase K; Yamazaki Y; Shinohara M
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2003 Jul; 2(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 16210825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal location for arterial input function measurements near the middle cerebral artery in first-pass perfusion MRI.
Bleeker EJ; van Buchem MA; van Osch MJ
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2009 Apr; 29(4):840-52. PubMed ID: 19142193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
