344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17473550)
1. The flip of the coin: exempt, expedited, or full IRB review?
Bliss-Holtz J
AACN Adv Crit Care; 2007; 18(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 17473550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Faculty guide to the institutional review board process.
Kaktins NM
Nurse Educ; 2009; 34(6):244-8. PubMed ID: 19901736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.
Gandhi R
J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. To expedite or not to expedite ...that is the question.
Wicher CC; Michalek AM
J Cancer Educ; 2008; 23(3):140-1. PubMed ID: 18709583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research.
Noah BA
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. IRB triage of projects that involve medical record review.
Amdur R; Speers MA; Bankert E
IRB; 2000 Jan; 22(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 12546009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving protection for human research subjects: better oversight, not just more oversight.
Schluger NW
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):13-5. PubMed ID: 19061098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research and quality improvement activities: when is institutional review board review needed?
McNett M; Lawry K
J Neurosci Nurs; 2009 Dec; 41(6):344-7. PubMed ID: 19998686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Searching for "research involving human subjects"--What is examined? What is exempt? What is exasperating?
Pritchard IA
IRB; 2001; 23(3):5-13. PubMed ID: 11789525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New guidance on when and how to report human research problems.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 16270442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Office of Human Research Protections.
Chamberlain B
Clin Nurse Spec; 2008; 22(6):268. PubMed ID: 18955842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Federal office on protecting human subjects issues new decision charts.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2004 Dec; 19(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 15810177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Children as research subjects: a proposal to revise the current federal regulations using a moral framework.
Ross LF
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1997; 8(1):159-76. PubMed ID: 16528858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The basics of human subjects protection.
Yoder LH
Medsurg Nurs; 2006 Apr; 15(2):95-8; quiz 99. PubMed ID: 16700248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Not all research is equal: taking social science research into account.
Rasmussen LM
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):17-8. PubMed ID: 19061100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Protecting vulnerable research subjects: practical realities of institutional review board review and approval.
Wichman A
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):88-104. PubMed ID: 15573431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of institutional review boards in protecting human subjects: are we really ready to fix a broken system?
Beh HG
Law Psychol Rev; 2002; 26(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 16514756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Regulating research with decisionally impaired individuals: are we making progress?
Hoffmann DE; Schwartz J; DeRenzo EG
DePaul J Health Care Law; 2000; 3(3-4):547-608. PubMed ID: 16594106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How to do human-subjects research if you do not have an institutional review board.
Rice TW
Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1362-7. PubMed ID: 18812001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Common (mis)perceptions about IRB review of human subjects research.
Lynn MR; Nelson DK
Nurs Sci Q; 2005 Jul; 18(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 15976051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
