These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
605 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17473645)
1. A comparative biomechanical analysis of spinal instability and instrumentation of the cervicothoracic junction: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Prybis BG; Tortolani PJ; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC; Cunningham BW J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 May; 20(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 17473645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Posterior-only stabilization of 2-column and 3-column injuries at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study. O'Brien JR; Dmitriev AE; Yu W; Gelb D; Ludwig S J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul; 22(5):340-6. PubMed ID: 19525789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of spinal instrumentation on kinematics at the cervicothoracic junction: emphasis on soft-tissue response in an in vitro human cadaveric model. Kretzer RM; Hu N; Umekoji H; Sciubba DM; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Oct; 13(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 20887140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics. Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical analysis of cervicothoracic junction osteotomy in cadaveric model of ankylosing spondylitis: effect of rod material and diameter. Scheer JK; Tang JA; Deviren V; Acosta F; Buckley JM; Pekmezci M; McClellan RT; Ames CP J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Mar; 14(3):330-5. PubMed ID: 21235305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation after one-level anterior cervical corpectomy in the human cadaveric spine. Karam YR; Dahdaleh NS; Magnetta MJ; Kim BS; Lim TH; Serhan H; Torner JC; Hitchon PW Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(7):E455-60. PubMed ID: 20847712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation techniques after one-level laminectomy and facetectomy. Eleraky M; Setzer M; Baaj AA; Papanastassiou I; Conrad BP; Vrionis FD J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Nov; 13(5):622-9. PubMed ID: 21039154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation. Setzer M; Eleraky M; Johnson WM; Aghayev K; Tran ND; Vrionis FD J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 22423633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine. Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct. Stein MI; Nayak AN; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24231054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhancement of stability following anterior cervical corpectomy: a biomechanical study. Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(8):845-9. PubMed ID: 15082982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical consequences of cervical spondylectomy versus corpectomy. Doğan S; Baek S; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR Neurosurgery; 2008 Oct; 63(4 Suppl 2):303-8; discussion 308. PubMed ID: 18981835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical analysis of rigid stabilization techniques for three-column injury in the lower cervical spine. Bozkus H; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Nottmeier EW; Sonntag VK; Papadopoulos SM; Crawford NR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Apr; 30(8):915-22. PubMed ID: 15834336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation in spine tumors. Mazel C; Hoffmann E; Antonietti P; Grunenwald D; Henry M; Williams J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jun; 29(11):1246-53. PubMed ID: 15167665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Internal fixation of cervical trauma following corpectomy and reconstruction. The effects of posterior element injury. Spivak JM; Bharam S; Chen D; Kummer FJ Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 2000; 59(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 10789038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of a simulated T-9 burst fracture of the thoracic spine with an intact rib cage. Perry TG; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; Francis T; McLain RF J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):481-8. PubMed ID: 24949903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The biomechanical effect of transverse connectors use in a pre- and postlaminectomy model of the posterior cervical spine: an in vitro cadaveric study. Majid K; Gudipally M; Hussain M; Moldavsky M; Khalil S Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(26):E1694-701. PubMed ID: 21681141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]