These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17474336)
1. Back to the future: Habermas's The Future of Human Nature. Prusak BG Hastings Cent Rep; 2007; 37(2):4; author reply 6. PubMed ID: 17474336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Back to the future: Habermas's The Future of Human Nature. Malmqvist E Hastings Cent Rep; 2007; 37(2):4-5; author reply 6. PubMed ID: 17476733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Remarks on Habermas's presentation of "L'avenir de la nature humaine". Lafont C APA Newsl Philos Med; 2003; 3(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 15115010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An ambiguity in Habermas's argument against liberal eugenics. Schäfer LP Bioethics; 2019 Nov; 33(9):1059-1064. PubMed ID: 31463995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The debate over liberal eugenics. Brock DW Hastings Cent Rep; 2006; 36(2):5-6; author reply 6-7. PubMed ID: 16604886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Biotechnology and the creation of ethics. Coletta RR McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):89-110. PubMed ID: 15709268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The debate over liberal eugenics. Agar N Hastings Cent Rep; 2006; 36(2):4-5; author reply 6-7. PubMed ID: 16604885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The debate over liberal eugenics. Lauritzen P Hastings Cent Rep; 2006; 36(2):6; author reply 6-7. PubMed ID: 16604887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rethinking "Liberal eugenics": reflections and questions on Habermas on bioethics. Prusak BG Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(6):31-42. PubMed ID: 16396203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. On genetic engineering and the idea of the sacred: a secular argument. Kaebnick GE St Thomas Law Rev; 2001; 13(4):863-76. PubMed ID: 12661545 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross-generational retribution and genetic engineering: reflections on chance and free will. Troster L Conserv Jud; 2002; 54(3):33-41. PubMed ID: 12735299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. From species ethics to social concerns: Habermas's critique of "liberal eugenics" evaluated. Árnason V Theor Med Bioeth; 2014 Oct; 35(5):353-67. PubMed ID: 25234409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The man on the moon, immortality, and other millennial myths: the prospects and perils of human genetic engineering. Annas GJ Emory Law J; 2000; 49(3):753-82. PubMed ID: 12645561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The new genetics: promise or threat to children? Alderson P Bull Med Ethics; 2002 Mar; (176):13-8. PubMed ID: 12408124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Liberal eugenics and human nature. Against Habermas. Fenton E Hastings Cent Rep; 2006; 36(6):35-42. PubMed ID: 17278871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bioethics as science fiction -- making sense of Habermas's The Future of Human Nature. Gurnham D Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2012 Apr; 21(2):235-46. PubMed ID: 22377076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Rereading Habermas in Times of CRISPR-cas: A Critique of and an Alternative to the Instrumentalist Interpretation of the Human Nature Argument. Wienmeister A J Bioeth Inq; 2022 Dec; 19(4):545-556. PubMed ID: 36149578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ma adam va-teda-ehu: halakhic criteria for defining human beings. Loike JD; Tendler MD Tradition; 2003; 37(2):1-19. PubMed ID: 15468502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]