126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17475146)
1. Correlation of the AOFAS scores with a generic health QUALY score in foot and ankle surgery.
Malviya A; Makwana N; Laing P
Foot Ankle Int; 2007 Apr; 28(4):494-8. PubMed ID: 17475146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and validity of the subjective component of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society clinical rating scales.
Ibrahim T; Beiri A; Azzabi M; Best AJ; Taylor GJ; Menon DK
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2007; 46(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 17331864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Results of an Internet survey determining the most frequently used ankle scores by AOFAS members.
Lau JT; Mahomed NM; Schon LC
Foot Ankle Int; 2005 Jun; 26(6):479-82. PubMed ID: 15960915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS).
Cöster MC; Rosengren BE; Bremander A; Brudin L; Karlsson MK
Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Oct; 35(10):1031-6. PubMed ID: 25015390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An evaluation of the use of retrospectively acquired preoperative AOFAS clinical rating scores to assess surgical outcome after elective foot and ankle surgery.
Toolan BC; Wright Quinones VJ; Cunningham BJ; Brage ME
Foot Ankle Int; 2001 Oct; 22(10):775-8. PubMed ID: 11642528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Responsiveness of the foot function index, AOFAS clinical rating systems, and SF-36 after foot and ankle surgery.
SooHoo NF; Vyas R; Samimi D
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Nov; 27(11):930-4. PubMed ID: 17144955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Outcomes Research (OFAR) network: feasibility of a multicenter network for patient outcomes assessment in foot and ankle.
Hunt KJ; Alexander I; Baumhauer J; Brodsky J; Chiodo C; Daniels T; Davis WH; Deland J; Ellis S; Hung M; Ishikawa SN; Latt LD; Phisitkul P; SooHoo NF; Yang A; Saltzman CL;
Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Sep; 35(9):847-54. PubMed ID: 25161151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Responsiveness of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS, SF-36 and EQ-5D assessments following foot or ankle surgery.
Dawson J; Boller I; Doll H; Lavis G; Sharp R; Cooke P; Jenkinson C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Feb; 94(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 22323689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the MFA to the AOFAS outcome tool in a population undergoing total ankle replacement.
Pena F; Agel J; Coetzee JC
Foot Ankle Int; 2007 Jul; 28(7):788-93. PubMed ID: 17666170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Critical evaluation of outcome scales assessment of lateral ankle ligament reconstruction.
Burn A; Buerer Y; Chopra S; Winkler M; Crevoisier X
Foot Ankle Int; 2013 Jul; 34(7):995-1005. PubMed ID: 23478889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pain dominates summed scores for hindfoot and ankle trauma.
Tornetta P; Qadir R; Sanders R
J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Aug; 27(8):477-82. PubMed ID: 23114415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Surgical treatment for hemophilia induced lesions of foot and ankle].
Zhang L; Weng X; Qiu G; Gao P; Qian W; Wang Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 27(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 23596681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is there a relation between AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and SF-36 in evaluation of Achilles ruptures treated by percutaneous technique?
Ceccarelli F; Calderazzi F; Pedrazzi G
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2014; 53(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 24239424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Responsiveness and validity of the SF-36, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale, AOFAS Ankle Hindfoot Score, and Foot Function Index in end stage ankle arthritis.
Madeley NJ; Wing KJ; Topliss C; Penner MJ; Glazebrook MA; Younger AS
Foot Ankle Int; 2012 Jan; 33(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 22381237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of early versus delayed weightbearing outcomes after microfracture for small to midsized osteochondral lesions of the talus.
Lee DH; Lee KB; Jung ST; Seon JK; Kim MS; Sung IH
Am J Sports Med; 2012 Sep; 40(9):2023-8. PubMed ID: 22879399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system?
Button G; Pinney S
Foot Ankle Int; 2004 Aug; 25(8):521-5. PubMed ID: 15363371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. One-step repair in talar osteochondral lesions: 4-year clinical results and t2-mapping capability in outcome prediction.
Giannini S; Buda R; Battaglia M; Cavallo M; Ruffilli A; Ramponi L; Pagliazzi G; Vannini F
Am J Sports Med; 2013 Mar; 41(3):511-8. PubMed ID: 23221772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of retrospective outcome scores in elective foot and ankle surgery.
Widnall J; Ralte P; Selvan D; Molloy A
Foot (Edinb); 2014 Mar; 24(1):28-30. PubMed ID: 24656458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle with matrix-associated chondrocyte implantation: early clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results.
Aurich M; Bedi HS; Smith PJ; Rolauffs B; Mückley T; Clayton J; Blackney M
Am J Sports Med; 2011 Feb; 39(2):311-9. PubMed ID: 21068444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sports and recreation activity of varus and valgus ankle osteoarthritis before and after realignment surgery.
Pagenstert G; Leumann A; Hintermann B; Valderrabano V
Foot Ankle Int; 2008 Oct; 29(10):985-93. PubMed ID: 18851814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
