These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Objective grading of the anterior eye. Peterson RC; Wolffsohn JS Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 19165123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating a new objective grading software for conjunctival hyperaemia. Huntjens B; Basi M; Nagra M Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Apr; 43(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 31326277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of subjective and objective conjunctival hyperaemia grading with AOS® Anterior software. Walker MK; Tomiyama ES; Skidmore KV; Assaad JR; Ticak A; Richdale K Clin Exp Optom; 2022 Jul; 105(5):494-499. PubMed ID: 34315357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How red is a white eye? Clinical grading of normal conjunctival hyperaemia. Murphy PJ; Lau JS; Sim MM; Woods RL Eye (Lond); 2007 May; 21(5):633-8. PubMed ID: 16518366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of fractal analysis and photometry to estimate the accuracy of bulbar redness grading scales. Schulze MM; Hutchings N; Simpson TL Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Apr; 49(4):1398-406. PubMed ID: 18385056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of ocular redness measurements obtained with keratograph 5M and correlation with subjective grading scales. Pérez-Bartolomé F; Sanz-Pozo C; Martínez-de la Casa JM; Arriola-Villalobos P; Fernández-Pérez C; García-Feijoó J J Fr Ophtalmol; 2018 Nov; 41(9):836-846. PubMed ID: 30293826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of an objective method of measuring bulbar redness to the use of traditional grading scales. Sorbara L; Simpson T; Duench S; Schulze M; Fonn D Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Mar; 30(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 17254834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The perceived bulbar redness of clinical grading scales. Schulze MM; Hutchings N; Simpson TL Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Nov; 86(11):E1250-8. PubMed ID: 19770812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new computer assisted objective method for quantifying vascular changes of the bulbar conjunctivae. Owen CG; Fitzke FW; Woodward EG Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Sep; 16(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 8944187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing ocular bulbar redness: a comparison of methods. Downie LE; Keller PR; Vingrys AJ Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Mar; 36(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 26890702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of Bulbar Redness with a Newly Developed Keratograph. Wu S; Hong J; Tian L; Cui X; Sun X; Xu J Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Aug; 92(8):892-9. PubMed ID: 26099055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Defining the Optimal Region of Interest for Hyperemia Grading in the Bulbar Conjunctiva. Sánchez Brea ML; Barreira Rodríguez N; Mosquera González A; Evans K; Pena-Verdeal H Comput Math Methods Med; 2016; 2016():3695014. PubMed ID: 28096890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bulbar Redness and Dry Eye Disease: Comparison of a Validated Subjective Grading Scale and an Objective Automated Method. Schulze MM; Ng A; Yang M; Panjwani F; Srinivasan S; Jones LW; Senchyna M Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Feb; 98(2):113-120. PubMed ID: 33534379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and Evaluation of Semiautomated Quantification of Lissamine Green Staining of the Bulbar Conjunctiva From Digital Images. Bunya VY; Chen M; Zheng Y; Massaro-Giordano M; Gee J; Daniel E; O'Sullivan R; Smith E; Stone RA; Maguire MG JAMA Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 135(10):1078-1085. PubMed ID: 28910455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Awareness of treatment: A source of bias in subjective grading of ocular complications. Cardona G; Esterich N PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226960. PubMed ID: 31877190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]