BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17475960)

  • 1. 18F-FLT PET does not discriminate between reactive and metastatic lymph nodes in primary head and neck cancer patients.
    Troost EG; Vogel WV; Merkx MA; Slootweg PJ; Marres HA; Peeters WJ; Bussink J; van der Kogel AJ; Oyen WJ; Kaanders JH
    J Nucl Med; 2007 May; 48(5):726-35. PubMed ID: 17475960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can 3'-Deoxy-3'-((18)F) Fluorothymidine Out Perform 2-Deoxy-2-((18)F) Fluoro-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Cervical Lymphadenopathy in Patients With Oral/Head and Neck Cancer?
    Schaefferkoetter JD; Carlson ER; Heidel RE
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1420-8. PubMed ID: 25869746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Histopathologic validation of 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine PET in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.
    Troost EG; Bussink J; Slootweg PJ; Peeters WJ; Merkx MA; van der Kogel AJ; Oyen WJ; Kaanders JH
    J Nucl Med; 2010 May; 51(5):713-9. PubMed ID: 20395329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the diagnostic value of 3-deoxy-3-18F-fluorothymidine and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the assessment of regional lymph node in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot study.
    Han D; Yu J; Zhong X; Fu Z; Mu D; Zhang B; Xu G; Yang W; Zhao S
    Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):416-26. PubMed ID: 21951837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of ( 18 ) F-FLT PET and ( 18 ) F-FDG PET for detection of cervical lymph node metastases in head and neck cancers.
    Hoshikawa H; Kishino T; Mori T; Nishiyama Y; Yamamoto Y; Inamoto R; Akiyama K; Mori N
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Dec; 132(12):1347-54. PubMed ID: 22992199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 18F-FLT PET/CT for early response monitoring and dose escalation in oropharyngeal tumors.
    Troost EG; Bussink J; Hoffmann AL; Boerman OC; Oyen WJ; Kaanders JH
    J Nucl Med; 2010 Jun; 51(6):866-74. PubMed ID: 20484426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of multiple time point dynamic positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with oral/head and neck cancer does not predictably identify metastatic cervical lymph nodes.
    Carlson ER; Schaefferkoetter J; Townsend D; McCoy JM; Campbell PD; Long M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 71(1):162-77. PubMed ID: 22742956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive value of 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography/computed tomography for outcome of carbon ion radiotherapy in patients with head and neck mucosal malignant melanoma.
    Inubushi M; Saga T; Koizumi M; Takagi R; Hasegawa A; Koto M; Wakatuki M; Morikawa T; Yoshikawa K; Tanimoto K; Fukumura T; Yamada S; Kamada T
    Ann Nucl Med; 2013 Jan; 27(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 22914968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PET and PET/CT of the neck lymph nodes improves risk prediction in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.
    Liao CT; Wang HM; Huang SF; Chen IH; Kang CJ; Lin CY; Fan KH; Ng SH; Hsueh C; Lee LY; Lin CH; Yen TC
    J Nucl Med; 2011 Feb; 52(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 21270454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in (18)F-fluorothymidine and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in patients with head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.
    Hoshikawa H; Mori T; Kishino T; Yamamoto Y; Inamoto R; Akiyama K; Mori N; Nishiyama Y
    Ann Nucl Med; 2013 May; 27(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 23378102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic value of only 18F-fluorodeocyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography-positive lymph nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
    Lee SH; Huh SH; Jin SM; Rho YS; Yoon DY; Park CH
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Oct; 147(4):692-8. PubMed ID: 22535915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [18F]FLT-PET and [18F]FDG-PET in the evaluation of radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer.
    Been LB; Hoekstra HJ; Suurmeijer AJ; Jager PL; van der Laan BF; Elsinga PH
    Oral Oncol; 2009 Dec; 45(12):e211-5. PubMed ID: 19692292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Change of maximum standardized uptake value slope in dynamic triphasic [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography distinguishes malignancy from postradiation inflammation in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective trial.
    Anderson CM; Chang T; Graham MM; Marquardt MD; Button A; Smith BJ; Menda Y; Sun W; Pagedar NA; Buatti JM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Mar; 91(3):472-9. PubMed ID: 25680593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnosis of metastases from postoperative differentiated thyroid cancer: comparison between FDG and FLT PET/CT studies.
    Nakajo M; Nakajo M; Jinguji M; Tani A; Kajiya Y; Tanabe H; Fukukura Y; Nakabeppu Y; Koriyama C
    Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):891-901. PubMed ID: 23468571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lymph node staging of gastric cancer using (18)F-FDG PET: a comparison study with CT.
    Yun M; Lim JS; Noh SH; Hyung WJ; Cheong JH; Bong JK; Cho A; Lee JD
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Oct; 46(10):1582-8. PubMed ID: 16204706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imaging proliferation in brain tumors with 18F-FLT PET: comparison with 18F-FDG.
    Chen W; Cloughesy T; Kamdar N; Satyamurthy N; Bergsneider M; Liau L; Mischel P; Czernin J; Phelps ME; Silverman DH
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Jun; 46(6):945-52. PubMed ID: 15937304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of 18F-FLT PET and 18F-FDG PET in esophageal cancer.
    van Westreenen HL; Cobben DC; Jager PL; van Dullemen HM; Wesseling J; Elsinga PH; Plukker JT
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Mar; 46(3):400-4. PubMed ID: 15750150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic value comparison between (18)F-FLT PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT volume-based metabolic parameters in patients with head and neck cancer.
    Hoshikawa H; Mori T; Yamamoto Y; Kishino T; Fukumura T; Samukawa Y; Mori N; Nishiyama Y
    Clin Nucl Med; 2015 Jun; 40(6):464-8. PubMed ID: 25546204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Usefulness of 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine PET for predicting early response to chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer.
    Kishino T; Hoshikawa H; Nishiyama Y; Yamamoto Y; Mori N
    J Nucl Med; 2012 Oct; 53(10):1521-7. PubMed ID: 22872738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of pretreatment FDG-PET SUV parameters in head-and-neck cancer: tumor SUVmean has superior prognostic value.
    Higgins KA; Hoang JK; Roach MC; Chino J; Yoo DS; Turkington TG; Brizel DM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Feb; 82(2):548-53. PubMed ID: 21277108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 57.