646 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17476003)
1. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The partial death of abortion rights.
Charo RA
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2125-8. PubMed ID: 17452437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
Smith PA
Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The abortion right, originalism, and the Fourteenth Amendment.
Graines S; Wyatt J
Clevel State Law Rev; 1999; 47(2):161-91. PubMed ID: 12715815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
Reilly EA
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The intimidation of American physicians--banning partial-birth abortion.
Greene MF
N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2128-9. PubMed ID: 17452436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision.
Kendall CC
John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
Borgmann CE
Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Court and abortion: worse than you think.
Dworkin R
New York Rev Books; 2007 May; 54(9):20-1. PubMed ID: 17517997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court.
Bertz RC
West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked.
Lucas R
Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. An historical perspective on the law of personality and status with special regard to the human fetus and the rights of women.
Curran WJ
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1983; 61(1):58-75. PubMed ID: 6343918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lesbians and abortion.
Robson R
Rev Law Soc Change; 2011; 35(1):247-79. PubMed ID: 21774157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The End of Roe v Wade and New Legal Frontiers on the Constitutional Right to Abortion.
Cohen IG; Murray M; Gostin LO
JAMA; 2022 Jul; 328(4):325-326. PubMed ID: 35802387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. After Ayotte: the need to defend abortion rights with renewed "purpose.".
Harv Law Rev; 2006 Jun; 119(8):2552-73. PubMed ID: 16827220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
Poppema ST
MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
Gartner EC
MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The argument that never ends.
Simon R
US News World Rep; 2003 Jan; 134(2):24. PubMed ID: 12561696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
McDonagh E
Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
Weitz TA; Yanow S
Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
