214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17476235)
1. Patenting the obvious?
Check E
Nature; 2007 May; 447(7140):16-7. PubMed ID: 17476235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Patenting of human embryonic stem cells in Europe.
Treichel P
Biotechnol J; 2009 Apr; 4(4):462-4. PubMed ID: 19370720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Stem-cell patents confirmed.
Hayden EC
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7185):265. PubMed ID: 18354442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Patenting basic research: myths and realities.
Kirschenbaum SR
Nat Neurosci; 2002 Nov; 5 Suppl():1025-7. PubMed ID: 12403976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Companies balk at California's patent rules for stem cell research.
Keim B
Nat Med; 2007 Jan; 13(1):6. PubMed ID: 17206112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethical questions to ponder in the European stem cell patent debate.
Curley D; Sharples A
J Biolaw Bus; 2006; 9(3):12-6. PubMed ID: 17152135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patenting human pluripotent cells: balancing commercial, academic and ethical interests.
Bahadur G; Morrison M
Hum Reprod; 2010 Jan; 25(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 19897856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stem cells caught in morality clause.
Siva N
Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Feb; 27(2):109. PubMed ID: 19204675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Intellectual property. U.S. Patent Office casts doubt on Wisconsin stem cell patents.
Holden C
Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5822):182. PubMed ID: 17431141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Challenges to human embryonic stem cell patents.
Plomer A; Taymor KS; Scott CT
Cell Stem Cell; 2008 Jan; 2(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 18371416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patents: patenting of stem cell related inventions in Europe.
Rutz B; Yeats S
Biotechnol J; 2006 Apr; 1(4):384-7. PubMed ID: 16892264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Patenting: European stem-cell ruling is misleading.
Green JB
Nature; 2011 Nov; 479(7371):41. PubMed ID: 22051663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Upending the zeitgeist.
Nature; 2006 Jun; 441(7093):572-3. PubMed ID: 16738631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomedical patents. Wisconsin stem cell patents upheld.
Holden C
Science; 2008 Mar; 319(5870):1602-3. PubMed ID: 18356497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Stem-cell techique 'contrary to public order'.
Abbott A
Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7121):799. PubMed ID: 17167440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A modest proposal: toward improved access to biotechnology research tools by implementing a broad experimental use exception.
Hoffman DC
Cornell Law Rev; 2004 May; 89(4):993-1043. PubMed ID: 15174465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Patenting, morality and human embryonic stem cell science: bioethics and cultural politics in Europe.
Salter B
Regen Med; 2007 May; 2(3):301-11. PubMed ID: 17511566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The stem-cell market - patents and the pursuit of scientific progress.
Murray F
N Engl J Med; 2007 Jun; 356(23):2341-3. PubMed ID: 17554114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Biotechnology update: news and views.
Debaets AM
Ethics Med; 2005; 21(3):188-90. PubMed ID: 16475278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. New guidance on the patentability of embryonic stem cell patents in Europe.
Fitt R
Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Apr; 27(4):338-9. PubMed ID: 19352367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
