264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17476490)
1. Comparison of hemispheric asymmetry in global and local information processing and interference in divided and selective attention using spatial frequency filters.
Yoshida T; Yoshino A; Takahashi Y; Nomura S
Exp Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(3):519-29. PubMed ID: 17476490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neural mechanisms of global/local processing of bilateral visual inputs: an ERP study.
Jiang Y; Han S
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1444-54. PubMed ID: 15978507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neural mechanisms of global and local processing. A combined PET and ERP study.
Heinze HJ; Hinrichs H; Scholz M; Burchert W; Mangun GR
J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Jul; 10(4):485-98. PubMed ID: 9712678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of response competition on cerebral asymmetries for processing hierarchical stimuli revealed by ERP recordings.
Malinowski P; Hübner R; Keil A; Gruber T
Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(1):136-9. PubMed ID: 11976769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Functional hemispheric asymmetries of global/local processing mirrored by the steady-state visual evoked potential.
Martens U; Hübner R
Brain Cogn; 2013 Mar; 81(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 23246827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatio-temporal dynamics of visual selective attention identified by a common spatial pattern decomposition method.
Li L; Yao D; Yin G
Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 1282():84-94. PubMed ID: 19501069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Asymmetrical hemisphere activation enhances global-local processing.
Gable PA; Poole BD; Cook MS
Brain Cogn; 2013 Dec; 83(3):337-41. PubMed ID: 24144929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cerebral asymmetry of the "top-down" allocation of attention to global and local features.
Yamaguchi S; Yamagata S; Kobayashi S
J Neurosci; 2000 May; 20(9):RC72. PubMed ID: 10777814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of visual and phonological features on the hemispheric processing of hierarchical Navon letters.
Aiello M; Merola S; Lasaponara S; Pinto M; Tomaiuolo F; Doricchi F
Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():75-85. PubMed ID: 29233717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationship between local and global processing and the processing of high and low spatial frequencies studied by event-related potentials and source modeling.
Boeschoten MA; Kemner C; Kenemans JL; Engeland Hv
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 15993761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hemispheric asymmetry in visual discrimination and memory: ERP evidence for the spatial frequency hypothesis.
Reinvang I; Magnussen S; Greenlee MW
Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jun; 144(4):483-95. PubMed ID: 12037633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On spatial frequencies and cerebral hemispheres: some remarks from the electrophysiological and neuropsychological points of view.
Mecacci L
Brain Cogn; 1993 Jul; 22(2):199-212. PubMed ID: 8373573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An ERP study of the global precedence effect: the role of spatial frequency.
Han S; Yund EW; Woods DL
Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Oct; 114(10):1850-65. PubMed ID: 14499747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recurrent Activation of Neural Circuits during Attention to Global and Local Visual Information.
Iglesias-Fuster J; Piña-Novo D; Ontivero-Ortega M; Lage-Castellanos A; Valdés-Sosa M
Span J Psychol; 2018 May; 21():E17. PubMed ID: 29804547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hemispheric asymmetry in global/local processing: effects of stimulus position and spatial frequency.
Han S; Weaver JA; Murray SO; Kang X; Yund EW; Woods DL
Neuroimage; 2002 Nov; 17(3):1290-9. PubMed ID: 12414268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neural correlates of within-level and across-level attention to multiple compound stimuli.
Han S; Jiang Y
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1076(1):193-7. PubMed ID: 16473329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptual load manipulation reveals sensitivity of the face-selective N170 to attention.
Mohamed TN; Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR
Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(8):782-7. PubMed ID: 19369907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Event-related potential evidence for a dual-locus model of global/local processing.
Dalrymple KA; Kingstone A; Handy TC
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2009 Jul; 26(5):456-70. PubMed ID: 20183012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatiotemporal mapping of sex differences during attentional processing.
Neuhaus AH; Opgen-Rhein C; Urbanek C; Gross M; Hahn E; Ta TM; Koehler S; Dettling M
Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Sep; 30(9):2997-3008. PubMed ID: 19172632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
