These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17477263)

  • 1. An in vitro system for the comparison of excision and wet-dry swabbing for microbiological sampling of beef carcasses.
    Cenci-Goga BT; Miraglia D; Ranucci D; Branciari R; Budelli L; McCrindle CM; Cioffi A; Mammoli R
    J Food Prot; 2007 Apr; 70(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 17477263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental comparison of excision and swabbing microbiological sampling methods for carcasses.
    Pepperell R; Reid CA; Solano SN; Hutchison ML; Walters LD; Johnston AM; Buncic S
    J Food Prot; 2005 Oct; 68(10):2163-8. PubMed ID: 16245724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microbiological sampling of carcasses by excision or swabbing with three types of sponge or gauze.
    Martínez B; Celda MF; Anastasio B; García I; López-Mendoza MC
    J Food Prot; 2010 Jan; 73(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 20051208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs.
    Lindblad M
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 118(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 17706823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of wet-dry swabbing and excision sampling methods for microbiological testing of bovine, porcine, and ovine carcasses at red meat slaughterhouses.
    Hutchison ML; Walters LD; Avery SM; Reid CA; Wilson D; Howell M; Johnston AM; Buncic S
    J Food Prot; 2005 Oct; 68(10):2155-62. PubMed ID: 16245723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hygiene indicator microorganisms for selected pathogens on beef, pork, and poultry meats in Belgium.
    Ghafir Y; China B; Dierick K; De Zutter L; Daube G
    J Food Prot; 2008 Jan; 71(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 18236660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sources and extent of microbiological contamination of beef carcasses in seven United States slaughtering plants.
    Sofos JN; Kochevar SL; Bellinger GR; Buege DR; Hancock DD; Ingham SC; Morgan JB; Reagan JO; Smith GC
    J Food Prot; 1999 Feb; 62(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 10030632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aerobic Mesophilic, Coliform,
    Jaja IF; Green E; Muchenje V
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Apr; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 29690529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of swabbing and destructive methods for microbiological pig carcass sampling.
    Ghafir Y; Daube G
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2008 Oct; 47(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 19241527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of experience with swabbing procedures on the numbers of bacteria recovered from carcasses by swabbing with sponges.
    Gill CO; Badoni M
    J Food Prot; 2010 Apr; 73(4):747-51. PubMed ID: 20377966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coliform and Escherichia coli Contamination on External and Internal Surfaces of Beef Carcasses with and without Tissue Adhesion Excision.
    Renter DG; Dodd CC; Noll LW; Nagaraja TG; Ives SE
    J Food Prot; 2022 Apr; 85(4):701-705. PubMed ID: 35076692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microbial contamination on beef in relation to hygiene assessment based on criteria used in EU Decision 2001/471/EC.
    McEvoy JM; Sheridan JJ; Blair IS; McDowell DA
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2004 Apr; 92(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 15109799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microbiological contamination of pig carcasses at different stages of slaughter in two European Union-approved abattoirs.
    Spescha C; Stephan R; Zweifel C
    J Food Prot; 2006 Nov; 69(11):2568-75. PubMed ID: 17133797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A national survey of the microbiological quality of beef carcasses and frozen boneless beef in Australia.
    Phillips D; Jordan D; Morris S; Jenson I; Sumner J
    J Food Prot; 2006 May; 69(5):1113-7. PubMed ID: 16715812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microbiological contamination of reindeer carcasses in different reindeer slaughterhouses.
    Vaarala AM; Korkeala HJ
    J Food Prot; 1999 Feb; 62(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 10030634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of the principal points of product contamination during beef carcass dressing processes in Northern Ireland.
    Madden RH; Murray KA; Gilmour A
    J Food Prot; 2004 Jul; 67(7):1494-6. PubMed ID: 15270508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microbial profiles of carcasses and minced meat from kangaroos processed in South Australia.
    Holds G; Pointon A; Lorimer M; Kiermeier A; Raven G; Sumner J
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 123(1-2):88-92. PubMed ID: 18234385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of sampling methods for the detection of Escherichia coli and Salmonella on Turkey carcasses.
    McEvoy JM; Nde CW; Sherwood JS; Logue CM
    J Food Prot; 2005 Jan; 68(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 15690801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microbiological effects of a routine treatment for decontaminating hide-on carcasses at a large beef packing plant.
    Yang X; Badoni M; Tran F; Gill CO
    J Food Prot; 2015 Feb; 78(2):256-63. PubMed ID: 25710139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sampling methods for microbiological analysis of red meat and poultry carcasses.
    Capita R; Prieto M; Alonso-Calleja C
    J Food Prot; 2004 Jun; 67(6):1303-8. PubMed ID: 15222570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.