166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17477289)
1. DESYRE: DEcision Support sYstem for the REhabilitation of contaminated megasites.
Carlon C; Critto A; Ramieri E; Marcomini A
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Apr; 3(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 17477289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using multiple indices to evaluate scenarios for the remediation of contaminated land: the Porto Marghera (Venice, Italy) contaminated site.
Critto A; Agostini P
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2009 Sep; 16(6):649-62. PubMed ID: 19572157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A spatial risk assessment methodology to support the remediation of contaminated land.
Carlon C; Pizzol L; Critto A; Marcomini A
Environ Int; 2008 Apr; 34(3):397-411. PubMed ID: 18031816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Decision support-oriented selection of remediation technologies to rehabilitate contaminated sites.
Critto A; Cantarella L; Carlon C; Giove S; Petruzzelli G; Marcomini A
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jul; 2(3):273-85. PubMed ID: 16869441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prioritizing groundwater remediation policies: a fuzzy compatibility analysis decision aid.
Nasiri F; Huang G; Fuller N
J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 16516373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of risk-based decision-support systems for brownfield site rehabilitation: DESYRE and SADA applied to a Romanian case study.
Stezar IC; Pizzol L; Critto A; Ozunu A; Marcomini A
J Environ Manage; 2013 Dec; 131():383-93. PubMed ID: 24211567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An overview and analysis of site remediation technologies.
Khan FI; Husain T; Hejazi R
J Environ Manage; 2004 Jun; 71(2):95-122. PubMed ID: 15135946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An integrated decision support system for the management of petroleum-contaminated sites.
Li JB; Huang GH; Zeng GM
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2001; 36(7):1163-86. PubMed ID: 11545345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Critical review of decision support tools for sustainability assessment of site remediation options.
Huysegoms L; Cappuyns V
J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 196():278-296. PubMed ID: 28288362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Regional risk assessment for contaminated sites part 3: spatial decision support system.
Agostini P; Pizzol L; Critto A; D'Alessandro M; Zabeo A; Marcomini A
Environ Int; 2012 Nov; 48():121-32. PubMed ID: 22903025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Groundwater pollution and remediation options for multi-source contaminated aquifers (Bitterfeld/Wolfen, Germany).
Wycisk P; Weiss H; Kaschl A; Heidrich S; Sommerwerk K
Toxicol Lett; 2003 Apr; 140-141():343-51. PubMed ID: 12676483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of multicriteria decision analysis tools to two contaminated sediment case studies.
Yatsalo BI; Kiker GA; Kim SJ; Bridges TS; Seager TP; Gardner K; Satterstrom FK; Linkov I
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2007 Apr; 3(2):223-33. PubMed ID: 17477290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combining GIS with fuzzy multicriteria decision-making for landfill siting in a fast-growing urban region.
Chang NB; Parvathinathan G; Breeden JB
J Environ Manage; 2008 Apr; 87(1):139-53. PubMed ID: 17363133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. State of the art of contaminated site management in The Netherlands: policy framework and risk assessment tools.
Swartjes FA; Rutgers M; Lijzen JP; Janssen PJ; Otte PF; Wintersen A; Brand E; Posthuma L
Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jun; 427-428():1-10. PubMed ID: 22578694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sustainability assessment of electrokinetic bioremediation compared with alternative remediation options for a petroleum release site.
Gill RT; Thornton SF; Harbottle MJ; Smith JW
J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 184(Pt 1):120-131. PubMed ID: 27511828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sources, pathways, and relative risks of contaminants in surface water and groundwater: a perspective prepared for the Walkerton inquiry.
Ritter L; Solomon K; Sibley P; Hall K; Keen P; Mattu G; Linton B
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2002 Jan; 65(1):1-142. PubMed ID: 11809004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of receptor-specific risk distribution in the arsenic contaminated land management.
Chen IC; Ng S; Wang GS; Ma HW
J Hazard Mater; 2013 Nov; 262():1080-90. PubMed ID: 22884730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Discussion on several key points of decision support system for remediation of contaminated sites].
Liao XY; Tao H; Yan XL; Zhao D; Lin LY; Li Y
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2014 Apr; 35(4):1576-85. PubMed ID: 24946620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integrated planning and spatial evaluation of megasite remediation and reuse options.
Schädler S; Morio M; Bartke S; Finkel M
J Contam Hydrol; 2012 Jan; 127(1-4):88-100. PubMed ID: 21531037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adapting a geographical information system-based water resource management to the needs of the Romanian water authorities.
Soutter M; Alexandrescu M; Schenk C; Drobot R
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2009 Aug; 16 Suppl 1():S33-41. PubMed ID: 18998185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
