BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

770 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17477942)

  • 1. Human hedonic responses to sweetness: role of taste genetics and anatomy.
    Yeomans MR; Tepper BJ; Rietzschel J; Prescott J
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Jun; 91(2-3):264-73. PubMed ID: 17477942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relation between PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) taster status, taste anatomy and dietary intake measures for young men and women.
    Yackinous CA; Guinard JX
    Appetite; 2002 Jun; 38(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 12071686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acquired hedonic and sensory characteristics of odours: influence of sweet liker and propylthiouracil taster status.
    Yeomans MR; Prescott J; Gould NJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1648-64. PubMed ID: 19180363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Thermal taste, PROP responsiveness, and perception of oral sensations.
    Bajec MR; Pickering GJ
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Nov; 95(4):581-90. PubMed ID: 18773913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PROP taster status and self-perceived food adventurousness influence food preferences.
    Ullrich NV; Touger-Decker R; O'sullivan-Maillet J; Tepper BJ
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2004 Apr; 104(4):543-9. PubMed ID: 15054337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re-evaluating how sweet-liking and PROP-tasting are related.
    Yeomans MR; Vi C; Mohammed N; Armitage RM
    Physiol Behav; 2022 Mar; 246():113702. PubMed ID: 35016967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Facial expressions and genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil predict hedonic response to sweet.
    Looy H; Weingarten HP
    Physiol Behav; 1992 Jul; 52(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 1529017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and hedonic responses to bitter and sweet tastes.
    Drewnowski A; Henderson SA; Shore AB
    Chem Senses; 1997 Feb; 22(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 9056083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nontasters, tasters, and supertasters of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and hedonic response to sweet.
    Drewnowski A; Henderson SA; Shore AB; Barratt-Fornell A
    Physiol Behav; 1997 Sep; 62(3):649-55. PubMed ID: 9272678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased negative emotional responses in PROP supertasters.
    Macht M; Mueller J
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Feb; 90(2-3):466-72. PubMed ID: 17141813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Responses of PROP taster groups to variations in sensory qualities within foods and beverages.
    Prescott J; Soo J; Campbell H; Roberts C
    Physiol Behav; 2004 Sep; 82(2-3):459-69. PubMed ID: 15276811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual differences in prefrontal cortex activity during perception of bitter taste using fNIRS methodology.
    Bembich S; Lanzara C; Clarici A; Demarini S; Tepper BJ; Gasparini P; Grasso DL
    Chem Senses; 2010 Nov; 35(9):801-12. PubMed ID: 20801896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) and 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taster status and taste thresholds for sucrose and quinine.
    Chang WI; Chung JW; Kim YK; Chung SC; Kho HS
    Arch Oral Biol; 2006 May; 51(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 16297856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of PROP-sensitivity on taste perceptions and hedonics in French women. A study performed without retronasal olfaction.
    Smagghe K; Louis-Sylvestre J
    Appetite; 1998 Jun; 30(3):325-39. PubMed ID: 9632462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PROP (6-n-Propylthiouracil) tasting and sensory responses to caffeine,sucrose, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone and chocolate.
    Ly A; Drewnowski A
    Chem Senses; 2001 Jan; 26(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 11124214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensory responses to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) or sucrose solutions and food preferences in young women.
    Drewnowski A; Henderson SA; Shore AB; Barratt-Fornell A
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Nov; 855():797-801. PubMed ID: 9929687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binary taste mixture interactions in prop non-tasters, medium-tasters and super-tasters.
    Prescott J; Ripandelli N; Wakeling I
    Chem Senses; 2001 Oct; 26(8):993-1003. PubMed ID: 11595676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Greater energy reduction in 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) super-tasters as compared to non-tasters during a lifestyle intervention.
    Coletta A; Bachman J; Tepper BJ; Raynor HA
    Eat Behav; 2013 Apr; 14(2):180-3. PubMed ID: 23557816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Food acceptance and genetic variation in taste.
    Duffy VB; Bartoshuk LM
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2000 Jun; 100(6):647-55. PubMed ID: 10863567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Propylthiouracil (PROP)--a tool to determine taster status in relation to caries experience, streptococcus mutans levels and dietary preferences in children.
    Verma P; Shetty V; Hegde AM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 31(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 17315806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.