BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1747796)

  • 1. Fraudulent research in science: the responsibility of the peer reviewer.
    MacDermott RP
    Cancer Invest; 1991; 9(6):703-5. PubMed ID: 1747796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NIH sees plagiarism in vision paper.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1989 Jul; 245(4914):120-2. PubMed ID: 2535671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Editors and auditors.
    Rennie D
    JAMA; 1989 May; 261(17):2543-5. PubMed ID: 2704114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When good scientists turn bad.
    Roman MB
    Discover; 1988 Apr; 9(4):50-55, 57-58. PubMed ID: 11653808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fraud in biomedical science.
    Satyanarayana K
    Natl Med J India; 1992; 5(3):134-6. PubMed ID: 1304290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
    Lang S
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigator labeled fraud has last published word: 'I'm sorry.
    Med World News; 1983 Jun; 24(12):40-1. PubMed ID: 11645491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deception in scientific research.
    Woolf PK
    Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
    Kline S
    J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrity of research papers questioned.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1987 Jan; 235(4787):422-3. PubMed ID: 3798118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
    Fox MF
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fraud squad moves in on universities.
    Cross M; Connor S; Anderson I
    New Sci; 1985 Jun; 106(1459):8. PubMed ID: 11655696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose responsibility?
    Wigodsky HS
    IRB; 1984; 6(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The process of publication.
    Koshland DE
    Science; 1989 Aug; 245(4918):573. PubMed ID: 11644383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific fraud probed at AAAS meeting.
    Smith RJ
    Science; 1985 Jun; 228(4705):1292-3. PubMed ID: 3832437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Allocating credit and blame in science.
    Chubin DE
    Sci Technol Human Values; 1988; 13(1-2):53-63. PubMed ID: 11650139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research.
    Kuzma SM
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ensuring integrity in biomedical publication.
    Woolf PK
    JAMA; 1987 Dec; 258(23):3424-7. PubMed ID: 3682141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. John Crewdson: science journalist as investigator.
    Cohen J
    Science; 1991 Nov; 254(5034):946-9. PubMed ID: 1948081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
    Sise CB
    San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.