These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1747796)

  • 1. Fraudulent research in science: the responsibility of the peer reviewer.
    MacDermott RP
    Cancer Invest; 1991; 9(6):703-5. PubMed ID: 1747796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. NIH sees plagiarism in vision paper.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1989 Jul; 245(4914):120-2. PubMed ID: 2535671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Editors and auditors.
    Rennie D
    JAMA; 1989 May; 261(17):2543-5. PubMed ID: 2704114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When good scientists turn bad.
    Roman MB
    Discover; 1988 Apr; 9(4):50-55, 57-58. PubMed ID: 11653808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fraud in biomedical science.
    Satyanarayana K
    Natl Med J India; 1992; 5(3):134-6. PubMed ID: 1304290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Questions of scientific responsibility: the Baltimore case.
    Lang S
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):3-72. PubMed ID: 11653082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigator labeled fraud has last published word: 'I'm sorry.
    Med World News; 1983 Jun; 24(12):40-1. PubMed ID: 11645491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deception in scientific research.
    Woolf PK
    Jurimetrics; 1988; 29(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 11654908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.
    Kline S
    J Pharm Law; 1993; 2(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 11653114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrity of research papers questioned.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1987 Jan; 235(4787):422-3. PubMed ID: 3798118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
    Fox MF
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fraud squad moves in on universities.
    Cross M; Connor S; Anderson I
    New Sci; 1985 Jun; 106(1459):8. PubMed ID: 11655696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose responsibility?
    Wigodsky HS
    IRB; 1984; 6(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The process of publication.
    Koshland DE
    Science; 1989 Aug; 245(4918):573. PubMed ID: 11644383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific fraud probed at AAAS meeting.
    Smith RJ
    Science; 1985 Jun; 228(4705):1292-3. PubMed ID: 3832437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Allocating credit and blame in science.
    Chubin DE
    Sci Technol Human Values; 1988; 13(1-2):53-63. PubMed ID: 11650139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research.
    Kuzma SM
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ensuring integrity in biomedical publication.
    Woolf PK
    JAMA; 1987 Dec; 258(23):3424-7. PubMed ID: 3682141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. John Crewdson: science journalist as investigator.
    Cohen J
    Science; 1991 Nov; 254(5034):946-9. PubMed ID: 1948081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
    Sise CB
    San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.