These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Filling materials for the posterior region]. Sotillo M Acta Odontol Venez; 1985; 23(2-3):175-84. PubMed ID: 3870251 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Postoperative sensitivity associated with posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Johnson GH; Gordon GE; Bales DJ Oper Dent; 1988; 13(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 3270041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Posterior composite resin restorations. Part 3. Matrix systems. van der Vyver PJ SADJ; 2002 Jun; 57(6):221-6. PubMed ID: 12229077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The influence of different base materials on marginal adaptation and wear of conventional Class II composite resin restorations. Krejci I; Lutz F; Krejci D Quintessence Int; 1988 Mar; 19(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 3269574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Restoration of cusped teeth using composite resins: direct or indirect method?]. Harb-Kadiri J; Khairallah W Chir Dent Fr; 1986 Mar; 56(329):43-7. PubMed ID: 3519115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Informed consent: direct posterior composite versus amalgam. Dlugokinski M; Browning WD J Am Coll Dent; 2001; 68(2):31-40. PubMed ID: 11764638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ivory fillings in ivory towers. Kushner C SADJ; 2002 Jul; 57(7):257. PubMed ID: 12271951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design. Duncalf WV; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Direct bulk placement for posterior composites using an anatomically shaped clear matrix creating true anatomic interproximal surfaces. Belvedere PC J Indiana Dent Assoc; 2006; 85(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 16821330 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Clinical evaluation of composite restorations on the posterior teeth after 4 years]. Prati C; Montanari G Minerva Stomatol; 1987 Oct; 36(10):765-9. PubMed ID: 3480412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]