265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17479335)
1. The influence of experience and camera holding on laparoscopic instrument movements measured with the TrEndo tracking system.
Chmarra MK; Kolkman W; Jansen FW; Grimbergen CA; Dankelman J
Surg Endosc; 2007 Nov; 21(11):2069-75. PubMed ID: 17479335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Skills Comparison in Pediatric Residents Using a 2-Dimensional versus a 3-Dimensional High-Definition Camera in a Pediatric Laparoscopic Simulator.
Guanà R; Ferrero L; Garofalo S; Cerrina A; Cussa D; Arezzo A; Schleef J
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(4):644-649. PubMed ID: 28039097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic performance: a novel 3D system with one camera.
Kong SH; Oh BM; Yoon H; Ahn HS; Lee HJ; Chung SG; Shiraishi N; Kitano S; Yang HK
Surg Endosc; 2010 May; 24(5):1132-43. PubMed ID: 19911222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retracting and seeking movements during laparoscopic goal-oriented movements. Is the shortest path length optimal?
Chmarra MK; Jansen FW; Grimbergen CA; Dankelman J
Surg Endosc; 2008 Apr; 22(4):943-9. PubMed ID: 17705078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The learning effect of using stereoscopic vision in the early phase of laparoscopic surgical training for novices.
Harada H; Kanaji S; Nishi M; Otake Y; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Sumi Y; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Sato Y; Kakeji Y
Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):582-588. PubMed ID: 28643059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Objective classification of residents based on their psychomotor laparoscopic skills.
Chmarra MK; Klein S; de Winter JC; Jansen FW; Dankelman J
Surg Endosc; 2010 May; 24(5):1031-9. PubMed ID: 19915915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sideways camera rotations of 90° and 135° result in poorer performance of laparoscopic tasks for novices.
Klein MI; Wheeler NJ; Craig C
Hum Factors; 2015 Mar; 57(2):246-61. PubMed ID: 25850156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intracorporeal suturing: economy of instrument movements using a box trainer model.
Hiemstra E; Chmarra MK; Dankelman J; Jansen FW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(4):494-9. PubMed ID: 21777839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Construct validity of the ProMIS laparoscopic simulator.
Pellen MG; Horgan LF; Barton JR; Attwood SE
Surg Endosc; 2009 Jan; 23(1):130-9. PubMed ID: 18648875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task.
Van Sickle KR; McClusky DA; Gallagher AG; Smith CD
Surg Endosc; 2005 Sep; 19(9):1227-31. PubMed ID: 16025195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional laparoscopic imaging improves surgical performance on standardized ex-vivo laparoscopic tasks.
Honeck P; Wendt-Nordahl G; Rassweiler J; Knoll T
J Endourol; 2012 Aug; 26(8):1085-8. PubMed ID: 22721451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Imaging in Adult Versus Pediatric Laparoscopy: A Simulator Box Study.
Feng X; Morandi A; Imvised T; Ure B; Kuebler JF; Lacher M
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Dec; 25(12):1051-6. PubMed ID: 26673534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The LapSim: a learning environment for both experts and novices.
Ro CY; Toumpoulis IK; Ashton RC; Jebara T; Schulman C; Todd GJ; Derose JJ; McGinty JJ
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 111():414-7. PubMed ID: 15718770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Camera and instrument holders and their clinical value in minimally invasive surgery.
Jaspers JE; Breedveld P; Herder JL; Grimbergen CA
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2004 Jun; 14(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 15471021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the impact of three-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance.
Lusch A; Bucur PL; Menhadji AD; Okhunov Z; Liss MA; Perez-Lanzac A; McDougall EM; Landman J
J Endourol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 24059674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of passive polarizing three-dimensional displays on surgical performance for experienced laparoscopic surgeons.
Smith R; Schwab K; Day A; Rockall T; Ballard K; Bailey M; Jourdan I
Br J Surg; 2014 Oct; 101(11):1453-9. PubMed ID: 25131843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Construct, content and face validity of the eoSim laparoscopic simulator on advanced suturing tasks.
Leijte E; Arts E; Witteman B; Jakimowicz J; De Blaauw I; Botden S
Surg Endosc; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3635-3643. PubMed ID: 30671668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simulated laparoscopy using a head-mounted display vs traditional video monitor: an assessment of performance and muscle fatigue.
Maithel SK; Villegas L; Stylopoulos N; Dawson S; Jones DB
Surg Endosc; 2005 Mar; 19(3):406-11. PubMed ID: 15624063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stereoscopic (3D) versus monoscopic (2D) laparoscopy: comparative study of performance using advanced HD optical systems in a surgical simulator model.
Schoenthaler M; Schnell D; Wilhelm K; Schlager D; Adams F; Hein S; Wetterauer U; Miernik A
World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 26242728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
